Laserfiche WebLink
Page 4 <br />June 8, 1998 <br />Mounds View City Council <br />He stated there had been a misprint in the New Brighton Bulletin, which had reported the Public <br />Hearing as being scheduled for Tuesday May 8, 1998. <br />Rod Melbo, 5601 St. Michael Street, spoke in opposition of granting the CUP and licensing. <br />He, too, stated his reason as being the barking of the dogs. He stated he has never made a <br />complaint to the Police Department. <br />Harold Grady, 5545 St. Michael, spoke in favor of granting the CUP and license. He stated the <br />dogs are provoked by squirrels and other dogs in the neighborhood and he suggested that the <br />City regulate the wild life in the neighborhood as a solution to keeping the dogs quiet. <br />Marcia Dumonceaux, 2359 Pinewood Circle, stated that she and her family had made a <br />concerted effort to keep the dogs quiet. She told the Council that she would be willing to work <br />with, not only Mr. Mectel, but all of the neighbors to help keep all of the dogs in the <br />neighborhood as quiet as possible, considering that dogs do occasionally need to bark. <br />Barbara Liukkonen, 2367 Pinewood Circle, spoke in favor of granting the CUP and license. <br />She agreed that the applicant's dogs are provoked by other dogs and wild life in the <br />neighborhood. Ms. Liukkonen told the Council the applicants are very conscientious about <br />keeping the dogs as quiet as possible. <br />Mayor McCarty closed the public hearing and reopened the regular meeting of the City Council <br />for consideration of the matter. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Koopmeiners to approve Resolution 5241, a resolution approving a <br />Conditional Use Permit and license for a dog kennel for Scott and Marcia Dumonceaux, located <br />at 2359 Pinewood Circle, with stipulations. <br />Stigney suggested that one of the stipulations should read that the City Council can review and <br />revoke the CUP and license at any given time, if complaints continue to be filed with the City. <br />Associate Ericson pointed out to the Council, item No. 4 under the stipulations list, this was one <br />of the conditions of approval as written in the Resolution 5241. He added that the City Council, <br />as one of its functions, has the right to review and revoke, with reason, any CUP that it grants. <br />VOTE: Ayes - 4 Nays - 1(Quick) Motion Carried <br />Mayor McCarty reiterated the City's position on granting the CUP and the license: The CUP and <br />the license can be reviewed and revoked if complaints about the dogs continue. He urged the <br />applicants and all of the neighbors to work with each other in an effort to control all of the dogs <br />in their neighborhood. <br />