My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2018/07/02
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
Agenda Packets - 2018/07/02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2025 2:32:38 PM
Creation date
9/11/2018 4:21:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
7/2/2018
Description
Work Session
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
6/25/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
253
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Subject: Stop Sign Request <br />What was the citizens request/ Did they request a sign type initially? <br />Concern about speeding. Request for a stop sign to address speeding. <br />IffSt. Louis Park Was the sign request appropriate for the issue? No, stop signs are installed <br />M I N N E S 0 T A to establish right-of-way at an intersection. Stop signs do not influence speeding <br />except in the immediate vicinity of the intersection. <br />What steps did you take? We performed a warrant analysis. Collected traffic <br />data on the legs of the intersection far enough away to get accurate speeds. <br />Review sight lines and crash history, in case there were other factors influencing <br />Debra Heiser the assignment of right-of-way at the intersection. The majority of our stop sign <br />Engineering Director requests do not meet the threshold set out by the MMUTCD. In response to the <br />request, we provide the requester with a summary of the information gathered <br />St. Louis Park and how it compares to the thresholds for the requested traffic control. We <br />also provide information explaining that stops signs are not installed to manage <br />speeds, rather for assignment of right-of-way. <br />If you did not approve, what did you offer instead? It depends on what the <br />data shows for speed. In all cases, we offer placing a speed board out on the <br />street to educate drivers on the speed limit in comparison to how fast they are <br />going. In cases where the majority of traffic is traveling at or below the speed limit <br />(85th percentile speed), we have also met with property owners in the field with <br />a hand held radar to assist with the perception of speed. Finally, if the data shows <br />that there are vehicles routinely exceeding the speed limit, we offer targeted <br />police enforcement and have installed speed limit signs on the street. . <br />Did that alternative option achieve the goal and was the citizen happy <br />with the solution? It depends. Most residents are satisfied that we took their <br />request seriously. In the case of a speeding concern, offering a speed board, <br />targeted enforcement, and signs does give the citizen satisfaction that we are <br />doing something. <br />Were there any adverse effects from this alternative solution? No <br />Has this alternative option continued to be recommended? Yes <br />How did you develop this alternative option? The alternatives were developed <br />to be responsive and give the citizen a tangible outcome from their request. <br />Other information: In cases where a stop sign does not meet the warrant <br />thresholds, the City's Traffic Policy allows for citizen petition. If 70% of the <br />property owners within 600 feet of the intersection support the installation of a <br />stop sign, we bring the request to the City Council for consideration. The majority <br />of our requests do not pursue this option. <br />36 DECEMBER 2017 1 LOCAL ROAD RESEARCH BOARD <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.