My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2018/07/02
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
Agenda Packets - 2018/07/02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2025 2:32:38 PM
Creation date
9/11/2018 4:21:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
7/2/2018
Description
Work Session
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
6/25/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
253
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Impact: <br />Due to the 2.8 inch standard RCWD had in place and requiring public linear projects, including <br />reconstruction even though new area was not added, Mounds View ended up with over 600 <br />rain gardens from 2008 to 2016 in large part due to our street reconstruction efforts. Had <br />construction occurred after January 1, 2016 it is likely that zero gardens would have been <br />required given the footprint of our streets did not increase. <br />Next Steps: <br />1. Develop policy <br />2. Determine if the number of gardens poses a fiscal liability we wish to diminish and if yes <br />explore the following options; <br />a. Petition the Board — they alone made the rule to continue imposing the rule in <br />force at the time of construction. If they rescinded this decision, based on the <br />exemption of public linear and the lower threshold of .55, all rain gardens could <br />be eliminated. <br />b. Apply for a variance - somewhat same as above. <br />c. Petition to fill in/remove or apply for a variance to remove some gardens based <br />upon the assessment resulting in credits in our bank. It appears we will have <br />credits, possibly enough to mitigate as few as 20 and up to 80 gardens. <br />3. If we pursue elimination via variance of petition, determine the policy/procedure by <br />which residents apply. <br />4. Marketing/education effort on the benefits of storm water management — replenish <br />aquifer, mitigate flooding, and reduce flowage, sediments and contaminants into rivers <br />and lakes. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.