My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2018/07/02
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
Agenda Packets - 2018/07/02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2025 2:32:38 PM
Creation date
9/11/2018 4:21:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
7/2/2018
Description
Work Session
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
6/25/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
253
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Evaluation <br />• Schedule a site inspection to review the issue <br />with the citizen. <br />• Perform crosswalk data collection. Identify <br />how many crossings and compliance rate of <br />vehicles at the requested location. If there <br />are 20 pedestrians crossings an hour or more, <br />consideration should be given for installing a <br />crosswalk. f31 <br />• If the current crosswalk exists, determine <br />compliance rate to identify if further <br />enhancements may be necessary. <br />Education Tools <br />Things To Be Aware Of <br />VIDEOS: <br />• Crosswalks should not be installed on high <br />• RRFB Video — shows the potential <br />volume and/or four -lane roadways with a dual <br />improvement in crosswalk compliance <br />threat possibility without additional safety <br />with an enhanced crosswalk <br />measures. This leads to unexpected drive <br />. RRFB on Campus — shows the potential <br />behavior where one driver stops and another <br />improvement in crosswalk compliance <br />does not, resulting in a pedestrian crash. ��1 If <br />with an enhanced crosswalk <br />additional efforts are included with installation <br />(reduced crossing distance, median islands, <br />RESOURCES/FOOTNOTES <br />significant lighting improvements, flashing <br />1. Minnesota State Statute <br />lights) longer distance crossings could be <br />considered./ <br />2. Minnesota Best Practices for Pedestrian <br />Bicycle Safety — Pages 3-8 include <br />• Agencies often get requests to upgrade existing <br />information regarding safety and a <br />crosswalks with additional treatments such as <br />flow chart to determine best practices. <br />in -street pedestrian sign or flashers. <br />Additionally, a table is included to <br />• Mid -block crosswalks are discouraged <br />determine when crosswalks are to be <br />• Consider the proximity to other crosswalks <br />installed along certain roadway types. <br />before installing a new one. <br />3. Pedestrian Crossings: Uncontrolled <br />• Crosswalks are hard to maintain <br />Locations — Provides a flowchart for best <br />practices and provides effectiveness for <br />Alternative Implementation Options <br />specific uncontrolled crossing treatments. <br />• If compliance is the issue, enforcement from <br />local police may be necessary. <br />• Plastic bollards to reduce roadway width and <br />crossing distance may bring more attention to <br />the crosswalk. <br />• Temporary installation of crosswalk measures <br />may test options to determine if they are <br />effective before permanent installation. <br />4. Minnesota Guidance for Installation of <br />Pedestrian Crosswalks on Minnesota <br />State Highways <br />5. Safe Routes to School <br />6. Blaine Traffic Management Plan —Page 21 <br />Addressing Citizen Requests For Traffic Safety Concerns 21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.