01-25-1999 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• Bob Long: I looked through the records on that and to my knowledge, to the best of our ability to research that, there has been no park dedication fee for the prior subdivisions, which was something that we wanted to find, but we were not able to find any record of any previous park dedication. Mr. Quick responded the owners of this lot must have owned an original five acre flat at one time. Motion/Second: Quick/Stigney. Approval of resolution number 5305, a resolution approving a minor subdivision of 8444 Greenwood Drive, requested by Dan Danielson, representing property owners Ernest and Marlene Danielson. Mr. Stigney offers an amendment. Stipulations covered in the resolution. Mayor Coughlin would like to make this official, and add this to the resolution. VOTE: Ayes - 5. Nays-0. Motion carries. ITEM 9F Consideration of approval of Edgewood realignment, trunk Highway 10, signal plans, and specifications. • Rick Jopke stated: Mayor and members of the council, the previous Council has authorized SEH fo pursue with the development of the plans to specifications for the realignment of Edgewood Drive, adjacent to City Hall and construction of the new signalized intersection on Highway 10 to Line up and continue on through the theater property across the street. This matter has been discussed previously at a work session in general terms. SEH has proceeded to develop a set of plans and the Council has had access to those in your Council offices and I have additional sets. The action that we are asking for tonight is for the Council to authorize that those plans be submitted to MNDOT for their approval process, and get their comments. According to the original schedule that was submitted by SEH. This matter will come back to the City Council on February 22 to actually approve final plans and inspect authorize advertisement for bids. We would like this plan submitted to MNDOT for their review. Steve Campbell from SEH is here if you questions. Mr. Marty asks if this has been presented to the Council work session. Mr. Jopke responded not to this Council, but the previous Council. Mr. Marty stated he has a number of questions about it. Mr. Marty stated he made some calls down to Tony Bennett's office, to try to get some information from him, and Tony Bennett, who is our Ramsey County commissioner, he and Paul (Kirkwald) is director of public works, they are both coming to our work session this next Monday and that could probably delay a lot of the questions. Mr. Marty said this wasn't presented to at least three of us on this Council, and Mr. Marty does have questions about this. Mr. Marty requested instead of taking Council time, this