Laserfiche WebLink
Downloaded from http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/ on December 12, 2016 - Published by group.bmj.com <br />'Education Development <br />Center, Inc, Waltham, <br />Massachusetts, USA <br />2Department of Epidemiology, <br />Brown University, Providence, <br />Rhode Island, USA <br />3Harvard Medical School, <br />Boston, Massachusetts, USA <br />Correspondence to <br />Shari Kessel Schneider, <br />Education Development Center <br />(EDC), Inc, 43 Foundry Ave, <br />Waltham, MA 02453, USA; <br />skschneider@edc.org <br />Received 18 December 2014 <br />Accepted 12 May 2015 <br />Published Online First <br />12 June 2015 <br />CrossMark <br />To cite: Kessel Schneider S, <br />Buka SL, Dash K, et al. Tob <br />Control 2016;25:355-359. <br />Community reductions in youth smoking after <br />raising the monhum tobacco sales age to 21 <br />Shari Kessel Schneider,' Stephen L Buka,2 Kim Dash,' Jonathan P Winickoff,3 <br />Lydia O'Donnell' <br />ABSTRACT <br />Objective Raising the tobacco sales age to 21 has <br />gained support as a promising strategy to reduce youth <br />cigarette access, but there is little direct evidence of its <br />impact on adolescent smoking. Using regional youth survey <br />data, we compared youth smoking trends in Needham, <br />Massachusetts—which raised the minimum purchase age <br />in 2005—with those of 16 surrounding communities. <br />Methods The MetroWest Adolescent Health Survey is a <br />biennial census survey of high school youth in communities <br />west of Boston; over 16 000 students participated at each <br />of four time points from 2006 to 2012. Using these pooled <br />cross-section data, we used generalised estimating <br />equation models to compare trends in current cigarette <br />smoking and cigarette purchases in Needham relative to <br />16 comparison communities without similar ordinances. To <br />determine whether trends were specific to tobacco, we also <br />examined trends in youth alcohol use over the same time <br />period. <br />Results From 2006 to 2010, the decrease in 30 -day <br />smoking in Needham (from 13% to 7%) was significantly <br />greater than in the comparison communities (from 15% to <br />12%; p<.001). This larger decline was consistent for both <br />genders, Caucasian and non -Caucasian youth, and grades <br />10, 11 and 12. Cigarette purchases among current <br />smokers also declined significantly more in Needham than <br />in the comparison communities during this time. In <br />contrast, there were no comparable differences for current <br />alcohol use. <br />Conclusions Our results suggest that raising the <br />minimum sales age to 21 for tobacco contributes to a <br />greater decline in youth smoking relative to communities <br />that did not pass this ordinance. These findings support <br />local community -level action to raise the tobacco sales age <br />to 21. <br />INTRODUCTION <br />Raising the legal age of tobacco sales to 21 to reduce <br />youth smoking has gained increasing support <br />among prevention advocates' who are working to <br />reduce youth smoking initiation as a primary means <br />of preventing addiction later in life. Nearly 1 in 10 <br />high school youth experiment with cigarettes before <br />age 13, and 4% have smoked regularly.2 These <br />youth who initiate smoking in adolescence are at <br />greater risk of becoming addicted to tobacco as <br />adults. 3 4 Conversely, research shows that the major- <br />ity of adults who are addicted to cigarettes began <br />smoking daily before age 18.4 <br />In addition, many people who purchase cigar- <br />ettes for minors are under 21 themselves.s This <br />suggests that prohibiting young adults under 21 <br />from purchasing cigarettes would reduce the <br />number of legal buyers in adolescents' social <br />circles, thereby disrupting the supply of cigarettes <br />to adolescents. Given that youth attitudes towards <br />smoking, such as perceived risk and disapproval of <br />smoking, have levelled off or lessened since 2007,6 <br />reducing access to cigarettes is an important pre- <br />vention strategy. <br />A recent report by the Institute of Medicine sug- <br />gests that raising the minimum age of legal access <br />to tobacco to 21 would result in a 12% decrease in <br />the prevalence of tobacco use among today's teen- <br />agers once they become adults.7 Another simula- <br />tion of the impact of raising the legal smoking age <br />to 21 in the USA suggests that adolescent smoking <br />would be reduced by more than half in 7 years.8 <br />There is broad public support for this effort, with <br />70% of adults in support of raising the minimum <br />sales age to 21, including a majority of adults in all <br />demographic and smoking status categories.9 <br />Despite these promising projections, there is little <br />direct evidence that raising the minimum purchase <br />age for tobacco would lead to a decline in youth <br />smoking. <br />In April of 2005, Needham, Massachusetts became <br />the first town in the USA to raise the minimum <br />tobacco sales age to 21; it was not adopted elsewhere <br />in the USA until 2012 (DJ Wilson, Director, <br />Massachusetts Municipal Association Tobacco <br />Control Technical Assistance Program, personal com- <br />munication, 7 November 2014.). In this paper, we <br />use data from the MetroWest Adolescent Health <br />Survey (MWAHS) to compare youth smoking trends <br />from 2006 to 2012 in Needham with 16 surrounding <br />communities that did not pass this ordinance. To the <br />best of our knowledge, this is the first study to <br />examine trends in the actual prevalence of smoking <br />associated with raising the minimum sales age. We <br />examined: (1) whether smoking declined more in <br />Needham than in the nearby communities; and (2) <br />whether the effect was specific to tobacco or if <br />similar patterns were also found for alcohol. <br />METHODS <br />The MWAHS is a school-based census of youth in <br />25 communities in the Boston metropolitan area <br />served by the MetroWest Health Foundation, <br />having the primary goal of informing local preven- <br />tion efforts. It has been administered biennially <br />since fall, 2006 to students in grades 9-12. Of the <br />26 public high schools in the region served by the <br />foundation, 18 began the survey in 2006. Of these, <br />17 high schools participated in all four surveys <br />(2006, 2008, 2010 and 2012) and are included in <br />this analysis. Student participation rates ranged <br />from 88.8% to 89.6% over the four surveys, and <br />the number of participants ranged from 16 385 to <br />BMJ Kessel Schneider S, etal. Tob Control 2016;25:355-359. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-052207 355 <br />