Downloaded from http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/ on December 12, 2016 - Published by group.bmj.com
<br />'Education Development
<br />Center, Inc, Waltham,
<br />Massachusetts, USA
<br />2Department of Epidemiology,
<br />Brown University, Providence,
<br />Rhode Island, USA
<br />3Harvard Medical School,
<br />Boston, Massachusetts, USA
<br />Correspondence to
<br />Shari Kessel Schneider,
<br />Education Development Center
<br />(EDC), Inc, 43 Foundry Ave,
<br />Waltham, MA 02453, USA;
<br />skschneider@edc.org
<br />Received 18 December 2014
<br />Accepted 12 May 2015
<br />Published Online First
<br />12 June 2015
<br />CrossMark
<br />To cite: Kessel Schneider S,
<br />Buka SL, Dash K, et al. Tob
<br />Control 2016;25:355-359.
<br />Community reductions in youth smoking after
<br />raising the monhum tobacco sales age to 21
<br />Shari Kessel Schneider,' Stephen L Buka,2 Kim Dash,' Jonathan P Winickoff,3
<br />Lydia O'Donnell'
<br />ABSTRACT
<br />Objective Raising the tobacco sales age to 21 has
<br />gained support as a promising strategy to reduce youth
<br />cigarette access, but there is little direct evidence of its
<br />impact on adolescent smoking. Using regional youth survey
<br />data, we compared youth smoking trends in Needham,
<br />Massachusetts—which raised the minimum purchase age
<br />in 2005—with those of 16 surrounding communities.
<br />Methods The MetroWest Adolescent Health Survey is a
<br />biennial census survey of high school youth in communities
<br />west of Boston; over 16 000 students participated at each
<br />of four time points from 2006 to 2012. Using these pooled
<br />cross-section data, we used generalised estimating
<br />equation models to compare trends in current cigarette
<br />smoking and cigarette purchases in Needham relative to
<br />16 comparison communities without similar ordinances. To
<br />determine whether trends were specific to tobacco, we also
<br />examined trends in youth alcohol use over the same time
<br />period.
<br />Results From 2006 to 2010, the decrease in 30 -day
<br />smoking in Needham (from 13% to 7%) was significantly
<br />greater than in the comparison communities (from 15% to
<br />12%; p<.001). This larger decline was consistent for both
<br />genders, Caucasian and non -Caucasian youth, and grades
<br />10, 11 and 12. Cigarette purchases among current
<br />smokers also declined significantly more in Needham than
<br />in the comparison communities during this time. In
<br />contrast, there were no comparable differences for current
<br />alcohol use.
<br />Conclusions Our results suggest that raising the
<br />minimum sales age to 21 for tobacco contributes to a
<br />greater decline in youth smoking relative to communities
<br />that did not pass this ordinance. These findings support
<br />local community -level action to raise the tobacco sales age
<br />to 21.
<br />INTRODUCTION
<br />Raising the legal age of tobacco sales to 21 to reduce
<br />youth smoking has gained increasing support
<br />among prevention advocates' who are working to
<br />reduce youth smoking initiation as a primary means
<br />of preventing addiction later in life. Nearly 1 in 10
<br />high school youth experiment with cigarettes before
<br />age 13, and 4% have smoked regularly.2 These
<br />youth who initiate smoking in adolescence are at
<br />greater risk of becoming addicted to tobacco as
<br />adults. 3 4 Conversely, research shows that the major-
<br />ity of adults who are addicted to cigarettes began
<br />smoking daily before age 18.4
<br />In addition, many people who purchase cigar-
<br />ettes for minors are under 21 themselves.s This
<br />suggests that prohibiting young adults under 21
<br />from purchasing cigarettes would reduce the
<br />number of legal buyers in adolescents' social
<br />circles, thereby disrupting the supply of cigarettes
<br />to adolescents. Given that youth attitudes towards
<br />smoking, such as perceived risk and disapproval of
<br />smoking, have levelled off or lessened since 2007,6
<br />reducing access to cigarettes is an important pre-
<br />vention strategy.
<br />A recent report by the Institute of Medicine sug-
<br />gests that raising the minimum age of legal access
<br />to tobacco to 21 would result in a 12% decrease in
<br />the prevalence of tobacco use among today's teen-
<br />agers once they become adults.7 Another simula-
<br />tion of the impact of raising the legal smoking age
<br />to 21 in the USA suggests that adolescent smoking
<br />would be reduced by more than half in 7 years.8
<br />There is broad public support for this effort, with
<br />70% of adults in support of raising the minimum
<br />sales age to 21, including a majority of adults in all
<br />demographic and smoking status categories.9
<br />Despite these promising projections, there is little
<br />direct evidence that raising the minimum purchase
<br />age for tobacco would lead to a decline in youth
<br />smoking.
<br />In April of 2005, Needham, Massachusetts became
<br />the first town in the USA to raise the minimum
<br />tobacco sales age to 21; it was not adopted elsewhere
<br />in the USA until 2012 (DJ Wilson, Director,
<br />Massachusetts Municipal Association Tobacco
<br />Control Technical Assistance Program, personal com-
<br />munication, 7 November 2014.). In this paper, we
<br />use data from the MetroWest Adolescent Health
<br />Survey (MWAHS) to compare youth smoking trends
<br />from 2006 to 2012 in Needham with 16 surrounding
<br />communities that did not pass this ordinance. To the
<br />best of our knowledge, this is the first study to
<br />examine trends in the actual prevalence of smoking
<br />associated with raising the minimum sales age. We
<br />examined: (1) whether smoking declined more in
<br />Needham than in the nearby communities; and (2)
<br />whether the effect was specific to tobacco or if
<br />similar patterns were also found for alcohol.
<br />METHODS
<br />The MWAHS is a school-based census of youth in
<br />25 communities in the Boston metropolitan area
<br />served by the MetroWest Health Foundation,
<br />having the primary goal of informing local preven-
<br />tion efforts. It has been administered biennially
<br />since fall, 2006 to students in grades 9-12. Of the
<br />26 public high schools in the region served by the
<br />foundation, 18 began the survey in 2006. Of these,
<br />17 high schools participated in all four surveys
<br />(2006, 2008, 2010 and 2012) and are included in
<br />this analysis. Student participation rates ranged
<br />from 88.8% to 89.6% over the four surveys, and
<br />the number of participants ranged from 16 385 to
<br />BMJ Kessel Schneider S, etal. Tob Control 2016;25:355-359. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-052207 355
<br />
|