Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council March 22, 1999 <br />Regular Meeting Page 10 <br />if the Council was not comfortable with the amount of discussion at the last Work Session, <br />perhaps other questions pertaining to the overall picture of the finances at the golf course could <br />be addressed at an upcoming Work Session. <br />City Administrator Whiting pointed out that two additional questions had come forward <br />regarding how this consideration relates to other City trucks, particularly those in the Public <br />Works Department, and whether or not there is a truck which could be utilized for this purpose. <br />He indicated there was also the matter of the personal use of vehicles, which has come forward <br />on occasion, and possibly warrants discussion as well. He stated he had not seen anything of <br />concern in this regard. He noted that through speaking with Mr. Hammerschmidt, and based <br />upon the location of his residence, it would appear to be cost effective to take a truck home, in <br />order to pick up a load on the way to the golf course, or to have the vehicle maintained. <br />Mayor Coughlin advised that the discussion should be germane to the postponement. <br />Mayor Coughlin stated in light of the Staff Report, and the fact that they were beginning to see <br />50-degree temperatures, it was simply a matter of time before the frost would be off the ground, <br />and the golf course could be opened. He advised that the sooner this occurs, the better, adding <br />that the better the quality of the golf course, the more it would be utilized, and people would be <br />willing to pay their hard-earned cash to do so. He stated the Staff Report had provided answers <br />to the majority of questions he had in this regard, and for this reason, he would oppose the <br />postponement. <br />• Council Member Stigney inquired how postponing the decision until after the April 5 Work <br />Session would be detrimental to anything they were proposing to do at the golf course, and why <br />this could not be resolved in conjunction with utilizing a vehicle from the Public Works <br />Department. <br />Mr. Hammerschmidt indicated he was not clear regarding the Public Works Department <br />schedule, in terms of available vehicles. He advised that the previous Council had discussed <br />how the golf course could do a quid quo pro with other departments, when the golf course is an <br />enterprise unit. He explained that in the past, as the Golf Course Director, he has performed <br />certain tasks such as spraying the parks, and has used Parks and Recreation Department <br />equipment at the golf course, which was the nature of this agreement. He pointed out that <br />previous Council's have directed the golf course to be certain they remain separate, and not <br />utilize City-owned or other City facilities to make the golf course successful. <br />Mr. Hammerschmidt stated the Public Works Department has no tracking method by which to <br />charge for equipment, and even if there was a Public Works truck available for the year, there <br />was an issue regarding how the charges would be calculated, and who would set the price. He <br />indicated he had discussed this matter with Director of Public Works Ulrich, who advised that <br />during the same period of time they become busy, the workers for both the parks the streets are <br />utilizing the vehicles, therefore, it was his understanding that no vehicle would be available. <br />Mr. Hammerschmidt stated he could not schedule the use of a truck, because he did not know in <br />advance when they could proceed with the project. He explained that much this would relate to <br />the timing between the busy morning crowd, and busy leagues. He indicated that oftentimes <br />there is an hour and a half window, between noon and 1:30 p.m. during which the work can be <br />done, however, that maybe all they are able to accomplish on that particular day. He stated that <br />