Laserfiche WebLink
the City would have to purchase easements from those individuals to widen the road. Mayor <br />Coughlin stated the vast majority of those surveyed want that section retained at 24 feet and, in <br />-light of the right-of--way purchase issue, he agrees. <br />Mayor Coughlin noted the considerable desire on behalf of most to put a path along the St. Paul <br />Water Works easement but a similar proposed path along the edge of the lake was not viewed as <br />a good idea with the main concern being it is private property on both sides of the road and <br />creating a public path would lend itself to people believing the lake front was public, not private <br />land. He stated his concurrence with that indication. <br />Mayor Coughlin noted the intersection realignment which the majority support due to safety <br />issues. He recommended, based on the survey and discussions with residents, consideration of a <br />26 foot wide roadway north of Highway 10, a three foot shoulder on one side and a one foot <br />shoulder on the other, south of Highway 10 the roadway width will be left at 24 feet, County <br />Road I will be left at 24 feet unless the St. Paul Water Works allows widening to 26 feet <br />expanding to north, adding a path on County Road I, constructing no path on the southeast edge <br />of the lake, and realigning the intersection of County Road I and Spring Lake Road when <br />constructed. <br />MOTION/SECOND: CoughlinlMarty. Motion to accept the Spring Lake Road 1 County I street <br />project survey as submitted and direct staff to notify Ramsey County of the desired design to <br />construct a 26 foot wide roadway north of Highway 10, a three foot shoulder on one side and a <br />• one foot shoulder on the other, south of Highway 10 the roadway width will be left at 24 feet, <br />County Road I will be left at 24 feet unless the St. Paul Water Works allows widening to 26 feet <br />expanding to north, adding a path on County Road I, constructing no path on the southeast edge <br />of Spring Lake, and realigning the intersection of County Road I and Spring Lake Road when <br />constructed. <br />Upon inquiry, Director of Public Works Ulrich answered questions regarding the width of <br />several roadways and stated the project will treat the storm water going into Spring Lake but do <br />very little to alleviate drainage problems. <br />Council Member Quick asked if engineering work has been done to address any problems that <br />could result to Carey Lane. Director of Public Works Ulrich stated a feasibility report was done <br />but nothing was determined if it will provide a problem. Council Member Quick asserted it is a <br />"shot in the dark" and could be terribly right or terribly wrong. <br />Council Member Marty stated it will not add significantly to run off either. Director of Public <br />Works Ulrich stated it will not significancy add any more run off except for two feet of <br />bituminous surface north of Highway 10. He advised the water will still sheet off the road to the <br />grass areas since the elevation of the roadway and manholes will remain the same. <br />17N:\DATA\USERS\JOANB\SHARE\MINUTES\CC\1999\04-26-99.WPD <br />