Laserfiche WebLink
service. He stated that the Council could pursue the Realife location further, when the legal <br />issues were resolved and more information had come forward. <br />• <br />Council Member Thomason stated that the Realife development was presently under <br />construction. She stated if the Council was to only allow Zep Manufacturing, and placed a <br />moratorium until more information was available, there was a possibility that the Realife <br />Cooperative would lose the option to have Reliant Energy Minnegasco as their service provider. <br />She stated that the Council should add the Realife location to Exhibit A at this time, or it would <br />be delayed so much that it would not be an issue. She noted that Realife and Minnegasco had <br />entered into their agreement in the beginning of June, and the Council was just discussing the <br />matter at that time. She stated that no opinions had yet been formulated by the Council, and <br />Reliant Energy Minnegasco did not know whether the Council would approve or disapprove the <br />matter at that time. She stated that she believed Realife and Reliant Energy Minnegasco had <br />entered into their agreement in good faith, and she had reservations regarding not granting the <br />limited use because of this. <br />Council Member Stigney stated that he could understand Mayor Coughlin's opinion as a <br />contractor, however, the questions and concerns regarding legal and safety issues had not yet <br />been answered to his satisfaction. He stated that he was not prepared to vote at this time. <br />Mayor Coughlin stated that Council Member Stigney still had time left, and asked if he would <br />care to yield the floor. <br />Mr. Mayerchak stated that both Reliant Energy Minnegasco and Northern States Power were <br />good companies, and he did not believe that was a matter of dispute. He stated that both <br />companies had served their communities well. He stated, however, that he would like to provide <br />clarification regarding the present issue. He stated that Northern States Power had recently <br />received a request for gas availability at Norwest Bank on Washington Avenue in Minneapolis, <br />traditionally a Reliant Energy Minnegasco service area. He stated that, because he was an <br />aggressive salesman, he decided to look into the matter. He determined that Northern States <br />Power would have had to run more than a quarter mile of main to provide service to that <br />building, and determined that in order to follow the proper steps, they would be unable to serve <br />that location. He stated that, in this case, Reliant Energy Minnegasco was aware that in order to <br />get a signed agreement with Realife Cooperative, they needed a Franchise Agreement first. He <br />stated that they were aware of this a long time ago, noting that six weeks prior, Mr. Melander had <br />stated that they were serving Zep Manufacturing by permit only. He stated that to enter into a <br />contractual agreement prior to a Franchise Agreement would create an invalid transaction, and <br />having a signed agreement does not necessarily supersede a Franchise Agreement. He stated <br />that, in this case, the process had been somewhat violated. <br />Mayor Coughlin asked Council Member Stigney if he would care to yield the floor for rebuttal. <br />Mr. Swintek stated that Reliant Energy Minnegasco was aware of how the permitting and <br />Franchise Agreement processes work. He stated that in this particular case, there was no reason <br />for them to think that a Franchise Agreement would not be granted. He stated that it is a <br />12N:\DATA\USERSVOANB\SHARE\M INUTES\CC\1999\06-28-99.CC <br />