Laserfiche WebLink
several E-mail communications regarding the final report, all of which were positive. He stated <br />that there would be a second public hearing on July 12, with members of the Streets Committee <br />• in attendance to answer questions at that time. <br />H. Public Hearing 7:25: for Approval of Renewal of Intoxicating Liquor <br />Licenses <br />Mayor Coughlin opened the Public Hearing at 9:03 p.m. <br />Assistant to the City Administrator Schmidt listed the six intoxicating liquor licenses up for <br />renewal. She stated that three of the licenses were for off-sale intoxicating liquor establishments, <br />and three for on-sale intoxicating liquor establishments. She stated that the background reports <br />indicated that all of the utilities had been paid to date. She stated that they had received the <br />Police Department Reports, and the fire inspections, although not finished, were currently being <br />completed. She stated her understanding that one of the Council Members had questions <br />regarding one of the licenses, and City Attorney Long had some information to provide on these <br />as well. <br />Mayor Coughlin closed the Public Hearing at 9:04 p.m. <br />Council Member Thomason stated that she had received some comments from the public <br />regarding Code violations and noise problems. She stated that there were concerns associated <br />with the license renewal of the Robert's Off 10 establishment. She stated that she had spoken <br />with some of the residents at that location who stated there were problems in regard to excessive <br />noise and people in the streets after hours. She stated that the residents had indicated they would <br />like to have some type of noise and privacy screening in place, specifically, a fence. She stated <br />that the previous Council had requested that trees be planted to accomplish this, but these did not <br />provide an effective buffer for either problem. She stated that the residents were not against the <br />license renewal, but would like to have some assurance that the issue would be resolved. She <br />stated that it was suggested the requirements could be connected with the license renewal process <br />and asked City Attorney Long if he would address the issue. <br />City Attorney Long stated that the City had ordinances in place, in particular the noise ordinance, <br />which dealt with these types of problems. He stated that, as a condition of the license, <br />compliance with the conditions of the ordinances was implicit. He stated the license could <br />specify that, as a new requirement, the owner comply with specific issues. He stated that, in <br />regard to screening or fencing, it was allowable to include these as a condition of the license. He <br />stated that the complication arose in obtaining and drafting the specific conditions of the <br />requirements through negotiations with the owner of the establishment. <br />Council Member Marty stated that, of the three on-sale liquor establishments, the Robert's Off <br />10 was the only one that affected a residential area. He stated that he could see the possible need <br />for action. <br />Mayor Coughlin stated the only comments that he had heard were in regard to the front and rear <br />doors of the establishment being left open, and the noise levels after normal hours. He stated that <br />19N:\DATA\USERSV OANB\SHARE\MINUTES\CC\ 1999\06-28-99.CC <br />