Laserfiche WebLink
Mayor Coughlin stated that it was not the City's responsibility to find a contractor or to deem <br />whether or not they are ethical, only that they are in keeping with the Code. He stated it is <br />incumbent upon any resident with a problem concerning a contractor, to do research with the Better <br />Business Bureau, Department of Commerce and other similar agencies, in dealing with these people. <br />Mayor Coughlin stated there is no conspiracy to get rid of houses or to run people out of the City. <br />He stated if there were, it was a conspiracy hatched twenty years ago when the developers ran these <br />lines, and it would be their conspiracy, not the City's. He stated they would not want to tie up the <br />City work crews with situations like this. He stated the City crews had enough work to carry out in <br />regard to the maintenance of City streets and the like. He stated, in his recollection of the Code, if <br />the City goes any farther than to allow this to be put on a deferred tax basis, it would set a precedent. <br />He explained for example, that the next time his sewer line gave way, he would ask the City to come <br />in and pay for that. He stated they had just heard a resident request the Council to be very prudent <br />with its budget. He stated, in light of this, to start intervening with what is deemed by the Code to <br />be a residential situation, would highly impact the budget at some level. He stated he did not think <br />it appropriate for the City to underwrite these situations. He stated he agreed that this was a lot of <br />money, and a horrible situation to have to face, however, it was no different than if the transmission <br />went out on your car. He stated the City does not have the authority or responsibility to deal with <br />private property. <br />City Attorney Riggs stated that Director of Public Works Ulrich's statement was correct, and the <br />Code does indicate the homeowner is responsible for the line between the water main, and the <br />structure located on the property. <br />Mayor Coughlin stated in light of the time, he would request further discussion of the matter be held <br />privately between Mrs. Vigen and staff. He stated with the consent of the Council he would <br />recommend they maintain present City policy, and request that staff attempt to accommodate the <br />financial issues, as best they can. He requested that staff additionally explore any possible county <br />or state resources that might be available to assist Mrs. Vigen in this regard. <br />City Administrator Whiting offered to meet with Mrs. Vigen and Director of Public Works Director <br />Ulrich, to discuss options that may assist in making the situation less painful for Mrs. Vigen, at her <br />convenience. <br />Council Member Quick asked City Attorney Riggs if the seller of the house had some responsibility, <br />as this is a newly purchased residence. <br />City Attorney Riggs stated this was highly possible, depending upon the contract entered into. He <br />stated that many times private real estate transactions include provisions indicating that the property <br />is accepted "as is". He stated these concerns were out of the purview of the Council, however, this <br />would be worthwhile for Mrs. Vigen to investigate, in terms of the contract and any warranties <br />provided to her. He stated this might provide an avenue by which to recover the costs of the repair. <br />Director of Public Works Ulrich stated that prior Friday, they had a repair very similar to this on <br />Silver Lake Road, which had been inspected by the Public Works Department. He stated, at that <br />13 C:\ADMIN\MINUTES\CC\8-09-99.CC <br />