Laserfiche WebLink
Senator Novak stated he appreciated those comments, noting that these were complicated issues, and <br />life was not as simple in the Legislature as some people might think. He stated everyone has a point <br />of view on everything these days, and an open forum m which to explain and describe rt. He stated <br />working through all of that is not always simple, however, he thought they have a lot of the facts and <br />history on their side, and was hoping that in the end, they will find a way to resolve the issue in a <br />manner acceptable to the public. <br />Council Member Stigney expressed his personal thanks and appreciation to Senator Novak for the <br />efforts he had made on their behalf with the airport issue, and hoped he would continue this during <br />the next Legislative Session as well. <br />Mayor Coughlin inquired regarding the status of the sales tax on City purchases. Senator Novak <br />stated that at the moment, it was status quo. He stated that over the years he has served on the Tax <br />Committee, and there have been very few years that he did not vote for the tax bill. He stated one <br />of these was the year that provision was included in the tax bill. He stated it was part of a deal that <br />was supposed to bring other revenues, in the form of dedicated sales tax revenues and local aid to <br />the cities. He stated that deal was not honored for more than a year, and in exchange for that they <br />have ended up with the sales tax on city purchases, which, in his opinion, is a tax on a tax. He <br />stated, as will many things in government, once it occurs, it seems to be very difficult to change. <br />He stated it is placed on the books as an expenditure, and it appears to be in tens of millions of <br />dollars, and the process of eliminating this particular provision is not so glamorous, nor does it strike <br />so close to home, as a rebate does. He stated it has become somewhat of a philosophical struggle, <br />and an ongoing issue, which does come up publicly in the Committee discussion. He stated people <br />do attempt to address it, but they have not been successful m changing it at this point m time. He <br />stated the direct answer to Mayor Coughlin's question is that the tax on city purchases is still there, <br />and still being debated, however, it is yet to be resolved. <br />Mayor Coughlin clarified for the residents that this is a provision that requires cities to pay sales tax <br />on purchases. He stated the residents are taxed to fund the City, and out of those funds purchases <br />are made, upon which a state tax is applied. He stated there has been some effort to eliminate that <br />tax on city purchases, which would essentially reduce the cost of local government. <br />Senator Novak stated that it had occurred to him that they have an entire generation of Legislators <br />who have never had to vote for a tax increase. He stated, however, about ten years ago they were <br />in one of the cycles where the state was in deficit. He stated it took about a decade to recover from <br />the depths of the recession, and the budgetary crisis in Minnesota during the early 1980's. He stated <br />that at this time, the state completely lost its credit rating and at one point did not have enough <br />money to pay its employees. He stated, out of all this, from the Perpich administration and through <br />the Carlson administration, and Legislatures of both parties, they have gradually developed a fiscal <br />strategy and a program that has led to not only regaining the credit rating, but a triple A credit rating. <br />He stated this has led to the tax cuts and other changes that most people view to be very positive. <br />However, at that period of time, there were a number of things done to raise money to help stop the <br />"bleeding" at the state level, and the cities paid the price on that particular issue. He stated he agreed <br />• that this should be corrected. <br />17 C:\ADMIN\MINUTES\CC\8-09-99.CC <br />