Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />Mounds View City Council August 23,1999 <br />Regular Meeting Page 21 <br />homeowner's were very unhappy about the flooding problems. She stated her neighbor at 7740 <br />Edgewood Drive has had his property re-graded and re-sodded, however, this did not solve the <br />problem. She inquired, in light of this type of flooding, how could they justify building two more <br />homes in that area. She stated the backyard of the home on the very edge of the proposed <br />construction was basically a swamp. She stated this house was vacant from the time she moved into <br />her home, 3~/2 years prior, until 6~/2 months ago. She stated she could not see how this proposal <br />would help this situation. <br />Kathy Gryzmala, 2374 Pinewood Circle, stated her home was directly across the street from the <br />proposed building site. She stated she purchased her home in 1992, and at that time, she contacted <br />the Rice Creek Watershed District, and inquired if they could purchase the subject property, for the <br />purpose of constructing a playground. She stated she received correspondence from the Rice Creed <br />Watershed District, which indicated the entire lot was subject to drainage easement, which meant <br />that no fill material or structures could be placed upon it. She provided the Council with a copy of <br />that correspondence. <br />Ms. Gryzmala stated she had obtained a copy of the plat map, shortly after moving to the property. <br />She stated this map contained the language "have caused the same to be surveyed, platted, and <br />known as Edgewood Square, and do hereby dedicate to the public for public use forever, the <br />. drainage and utility easements, drive circle, and the road shown as the plat." She stated Marcellias <br />Hasehus, the property owner, had signed this document, on Apnl 15, 1983. <br />Ms. Gryzmala inquired why Mrs. Haselius was not present at the meeting. She stated she had <br />attended every other meeting regarding this matter. She stated that Mrs. Haselius had never spoken <br />openly regarding her feelings on the matter, and it was her understanding that it had just recently <br />come to her knowledge that she is the owner of the property and stands to make some money out of <br />it. <br />Lisa Gilpin, 2358 Pinewood Circle, stated that she had challenged the Planning Commission and <br />would challenge the Council to look at the area, and tell her where the wetland starts and where it <br />ends. She stated that this was not possible. She stated that during the school year, she spent a <br />number of hours volunteering, and speaking about the environment. She stated she believed if they <br />were going to tell the children about the importance of the wetland, it was their responsibility to <br />make their words stand for something. She stated rather than being willing to give up their <br />convictions, they should make their words mean something. <br />Barb Liukkonen, 2367 Pinewood Circle, stated she opposed this development. She stated, while <br />it is not in the wetland as delineated by the Soil and Water Conservation District and the Rice Creek <br />Watershed District, it is within the 100-foot buffer, therefore, to say there would be no impact to the <br />wetland, she believed was incorrect. She stated all of the oak trees in that area will have to be <br />removed to construct the houses, and the vegetation will be disrupted and destroyed. She stated the <br />natural drainage patterns would also be disrupted. She stated there would be an impact upon the <br />21 C: W DMIN\MINUTES1CC18-23-99.CC <br />