Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council August 23,1999 <br />. Regular Meeting Page 38 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Coughlin/Marty. To Direct and Authorize Staff to Proceed with Option 3, <br />as Presented, Hiring a Housing and Code Enforcement Inspector, and Upgrading Only the Planning <br />Associate Position, and Utilizing the Payment Steps and Salary Levels as Presented to the Council <br />on Salary Budget Impact Options for Option 3 on the Reverse of the Staff Report. <br />Ayes - 2 Nays - 1 (Stigney) Motion carried. <br />Council Member Marty inquired if the Council was in agreement in regard to Option 3, however, <br />not the basis of establishing the salary as recommended. Council Member Stigney stated this was <br />correct. Council Member Marty inquired how much time staff would require to attempt to compute <br />the salary upon tax capacity, and base these decisions upon this criteria in the future, to prevent this <br />matter from coming up every time the situation arises. <br />City Administrator Whiting stated his assistant had traditionally done this research, and at this time, <br />he would require staff to do this. He stated he could attempt to find some other means of providing <br />some information, and the Council could make some judgement calls, however, there was more to <br />it. He stated that tax capacity was not the ability to pay taxes, or how much tax you can pay. He <br />stated they would require another meeting to explain this. He stated they should bring this up and <br />discuss it as best possible, during the budget discussion, and attempt to make a determination within <br />the next couple of months. He stated there were many factors to be considered. <br />Council Member Stigney stated he agreed, in that there were problems with using just tax capacity, <br />however, there were certainly more problems in utilizing just population, especially in light of using <br />populations that are more than twice the size of the City's. <br />Mayor Coughlin stated he would concur with City Administrator Whiting in that these were complex <br />issues, which were being made out to be rather simplistic. He stated he would rather take the <br />discussion to a deeper level than simply tax capacity, which if quizzed by a professor, they would <br />probably all fail in the definition of. <br />In the interest of time, City Administrator Whiting suggested the Council consider Items I, J, and <br />K, simultaneously. He stated they could approve the First Reading of Ordinance 640, and set the <br />Second Reading for the September 13 City Council meeting. He stated they could continue the <br />Second Reading of Ordinance 635, and set the Public Hearing for September 13, continue the <br />Second Reading of Ordinance 630 to the September 13 Council Meeting, and hold both Public <br />Hearings and the consideration of all three ordinances at that time. <br />Mayor Coughlin asked City Attorney Riggs if the Council could consider one motion for all three <br />items, or if they required separate actions. City Attorney Riggs stated that one motion would be <br />appropriate. <br />I. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 635, an ordinance to enact a new Chapter of <br />the Mounds View Code of Ordinances to Administer and Regulate the Location, <br />38C:~ADMIN\MINUTES\CC\8-23-99.CC <br />