Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council September 13,1999 <br />Regular Meeting Page 26 <br />process with the Federal Emergency Management Association, and the responsibility would be <br />theirs. <br />Council Member Stigney inquired if there was a difference in size of the structure previously on <br />the property, and the structure that was proposed to be constructed, in terms of encroachment <br />into the wetland buffer area. <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated the proposed structure would be approximately 175 percent <br />larger than the home and garage structures that were previously on the site, and it would take up <br />more of the buffer. <br />Council Member Stigney inquired if the previous structure was within the buffer. <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated it was. He explained that the buffer line goes up to the street, <br />and most of the homes on this block are within the buffer. He stated there is no way to change <br />anything in order to minimize the impact to the buffer, however, the extreme elevation change <br />would not normally constitute this area as buffer, and the impact to the wetland is minimal. <br />Council Member Marty commented that it appeared the entire lot was within the wetland or the <br />buffer. Planning Associate Ericson stated this was correct. He noted the elevation change <br />between the high point of the lot, and the low area, which is the wetland. He explained that as <br />the grade changes and comes up to the building site, there is an approximate 15-foot difference <br />in the elevation. <br />Council Member Stigney inquired if no mitigation was required. Planning Associate Ereson <br />stated there was not. <br />Council Member Stigney inquired how these homes were originally constructed within the <br />buffer, in that the previous requirements were more stringent in regard to the wetlands. <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated the majority of these homes were constructed in the 1940's <br />and 1950's, long before any wetland requirements were in place. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Thomason/Stigney. To Approve Resolution No. 5365, a Resolution <br />Reapproving the Wetland Buffer permit for aSingle-Family Dwelling at 6991 Pleasant Vie <br />Drive as Requested by Vista Construction; Planning Case No. 510-97. <br />Ayes - 4 Nays - 0 Motion carried. <br />Council Member Marty thanked Planning Associate Ericson for the maps, graphs, and <br />topographical information he had provided to the Council. <br />H. Consideration of Resolution 5354, a Resolution Denying a Wetland <br />Alteration Permit Request by Oakwood Land Development. <br />Mayor Coughlin stated that three of the Council Members had voted to deny a request for the <br />vacation of a drainage easement on this property, three weeks prior. <br />