My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 1999/09/13
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
Minutes - 1999/09/13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2025 1:24:50 PM
Creation date
8/1/2007 11:32:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
9/13/1999
Description
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council September 13, 1999 <br />Regular Meeting Page 33 <br />City Administrator Whiting stated he was uncertain, however, he believed it was approximately <br />$46,000. He stated this would change by the time the applicant attained this level. <br />Council Member Stigney inquired regarding the nature of Ms. Reed's Masters Degree. <br />City Administrator Whiting stated this was in Public Administration. <br />Council Member Stigney stated they were duplicating exactly what they did with the former <br />Assistant to the City Administrator, Cari Schmidt. He stated they were hiring someone with a <br />Masters Degree who wanted to get their foot in the door, gain some experience, and then move <br />on. He noted she was willing to take a pay cut in order to do so, however, within a very short <br />time, she would be back to her present pay level, and would now have experience to move on. <br />He stated, in his opinion, this is not the type of people they should be hiring into the City. He <br />stated he opposed this particular candidate, in that he did not see any long-term benefit for the <br />City. He reiterated he did not think this was the type of candidate to hire. <br />Council Member Stigney stated he believed they should hire people pursuant to the employment <br />policies, rather than waiving the policies every time they desired to hire a new applicant. He <br />stated there were 30 applicants, and he felt that some of the applicants would be able to work <br />within the City's original policies, in regard to vacation and sick leave. <br />Council Member Stigney inquired if City Administrator Whiting was aware of his reservations <br />regarding whether or not the position is necessary. He stated perhaps if the City Administrator <br />Whiting would take more interest and time in handling the internal administration of the City, he <br />would not think this position would really be required. He stated if rt were required, he believed <br />they should be looking at the staffing options of how to handle it. He explained that there is <br />presently a secretary, and that position could be an elevated secretarial position that could handle <br />the secretarial duties as well as assist the City Administrator with the administrative duties, and <br />incorporate these into one individual. <br />Council Member Stigney stated that if they were going to maintain the staffing of a secretary and <br />an assistant, the assistant position should be handled on an intern basis. He explained that the <br />intern would move one, however, would be very interested in learning, and would come in at a <br />lower rate, and work very hard for it. He stated, in his view, the proposed candidate would come <br />in at a high rate of salary, which would increase very shortly, and move on. He stated he did not <br />support this item. <br />Mayor Coughlin stated he thought it unfair to cast dispersions on the City Administrator in terms <br />of what he does or does not do. He stated he works with City Administrator Whiting very <br />closely as Mayor, and attends many of the same functions both within the City, and outside the <br />boundaries of the City, and he thought Council Member Stigney's statements could be construed <br />as damaging to Mr. Whiting's character. <br />Council Member Stigney stated this was his opinion, and that City Administrator Whiting is <br />aware of his opinion. He explained that he did not state City Administrator Whiting did not <br />require anybody to assist him, and if in fact he does require an assistant, it should be someone <br />who comes in to assist him. He stated to his knowledge there were City Administrators in the <br />past who were able to effectively run the City without any assistance. He commented that now <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.