Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council October 11, 1999 <br />Regular Meeting Page 14 <br />consideration, Transportation Policy and Transportation Finance, which are addressing State <br />policy in terms of the roads, and how they will finance them. <br />Representative Haake stated she had attended a meeting that date with the Metropolitan Council, <br />in regard to the original master plan for transit. She explained there has been discussion at this <br />level in regard to inter-modal systems, roads, light rail, commuter rails, and every aspect of <br />transportation. She stated whatever they decide to do, they are aware it will cost money. She <br />explained that continued maintenance of the roads is imperative, as this is how the Sysco <br />products are brought into the City, as well as all other products that must be transported, and the <br />roads are to the benefit of the people. <br />Representative Haake indicated the State is considering three priorities for the year 2000, and the <br />second of these priorities is transportation, as relates to the costs of transportation links, such as <br />the highway system, bottlenecks, and bridges. She noted the University of Minnesota is <br />developing sensitivity design training, which is similar to the process utilized in the Mounds <br />View area for Spring Lake Road and County Road I. She explained these residents received the <br />road they desired because they did not utilize MSA funding, which limits the residents' control <br />of the roads. She explained that the new road policy in Mounds View allows the residents of a <br />neighborhood to decide what type of road they desire for their neighborhood. She pointed out <br />with the sensitivity training, the engineers are beginning to research new concepts in street <br />design, and with this research they may discover that the City can obtain the roads less <br />expensively than anticipated in the original plan, due to the sand based soils in Mounds View. <br />• Representative Haake commented she was going to be assessed approximately $4,500 for the <br />improvement of her road, and the average street assessment would be approximately $4,200 to <br />$4,500, which represents 50 percent. She explained the Streets Policies Committee had provided <br />a recommendation that the road in front of a resident's property be considered the starting point <br />and allow the resident to "buy up" if they desired, and the second recommendation was to reduce <br />the assessment rate to 25 percent. She explained by doing this, they were aware the citizens <br />would benefit very much, however, the City must provide the balance of the funds, and bond <br />issues and different forms of funding were discussed in this regard. <br />Representative Haake stated she was present during the implementation of the original franchise <br />fee, and had looked forward to seeing it sunset, and continue to decrease, however, there are <br />issues at the State level, in terms of the levy limits, which have been extended for another year. <br />She noted one of the taxation Chairs has indicated the levy limits might be lifted next year, <br />however, they were uncertain this would occur, and in the interim, neither the City or the State <br />have the funds to proceed with street improvements. She pointed out this was the result of a <br />"crunch" felt not only by the City, but also at the State level. She added that the infrastructure <br />throughout the State is beginning to fail, and must be provided for. She indicated although <br />increasing the franchise fee is not the most popular solution, she was not aware of how they <br />would otherwise obtain the necessary funds. She inquired if the proposed ordinance would <br />sunset. <br />Mayor Coughlin stated it would, on an annual basis. <br />Representative Haake stated she appreciated Ms. Olsen's arguments, which were logical. She <br />suggested that if the ordinance sunsets in a year, people will have the opportunity to indicate <br />their feelings at that time, and in the meantime, they can salt this fund with $125,000, an amount <br />