My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 1999/11/22
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
Minutes - 1999/11/22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2025 1:24:50 PM
Creation date
8/1/2007 11:38:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
11/22/1999
Description
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council October 25, 1999 <br />Regular Meeting Page 21 <br />Director of Public Works explained that the letters were fixed. He added that a short message <br />• would flash, and a longer message would travel across the sign. <br />Council Member Stigney stated the number of words they typically utilize on the current signage <br />would not fit on the sign scale indicated in the staff report. He inquired if the proposed sign <br />would be able to convey they type of message the City currently displays on the existing sign. <br />Director of Public Works Ulrich stated the proposed sign would provide viewing of more words <br />per second than the current sign. <br />Council Member Stigney inquired if he would be able to read the entire message on the sign as <br />he drives by, and be able to understand the complete message. <br />Director of Public Works Ulrich stated the sign would scroll through three or four messages at a <br />time, and if a person was stopped at the traffic light, they may be able to read 7 to 8 minutes <br />worth of messages. <br />Council Member Stigney clarified that as he presently drives by City Hall, he is able to see a <br />number of words displayed on the sign, which convey a message. He explained there are an <br />average number of words utilized in these messages, and inquired if, on average, this sign would <br />have the ability to convey the same messages that are currently displayed. He pointed out this <br />was important, as shorter messages are not typically utilized. He inquired if the proposed sign <br />would indicate a loss or a gain of message capacity. <br />• <br />Director of Public Works Ulnch stated the electronic sign would represent a gam. He explained <br />the present sign utilizes four lines with 35 letters that are visible at one time, however, the <br />proposed sign, which is more legible and visually appealing, utilizes four lines, with two flashing <br />first, and two reappearing after the first part of the message has been read. <br />Council Member Stigney inquired if two lines would convey the same amount of message in the <br />same time frame as the four-line sign that presently exists. <br />Director of Public Works Ulrich stated it would. He explained that some messages would run <br />for 30 seconds, and convey more, and others could be conveyed in 10 second. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Coughlin. To Award the Bid Amount of $47,038.55 to Aim <br />Electronics, and Authorize Staff to Proceed with the Purchase of a Two-Line Electronic Message <br />Board, With the Shortfall of $7,038.55 to Come Out of the Contingency Fund. <br />Council Member Quick stated this sign will improve communications by a quantum leap. <br />Mayor Coughlin requested staff advise in regard to an additional funding source. <br />Finance Director Kessel stated the contingency on the 1999 budget was $48,000, and two items <br />for which they transferred some money out of the Contingency Fund this year. He explained <br />there was a transfer in the range of $6,000 to $8,000, for what purpose, he was uncertain, and the <br />airport litigation, which is over budget, is in the range of approximately $20,000 to $30,000. He <br />stated there was possibly one other item on the expense side of this fund. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.