Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council October 25, 1999 <br />Regular Meeting Page 23 <br />the pavement rating, data input, and GIS link to the software, so staff can make the necessary <br />• presentations for the different ratings. He explained that an itemized quote has been provided for <br />review, which indicates $6,000 for the rating, $1,800 for the data input, and $1,200 to provide <br />the software link. <br />Director of Public Works Ulrich stated there is approximately $6,500 remaining in the budget for <br />the Pavement Management Fund, which is the fund utilized for seal coating, patching and <br />miscellaneous curb and gutter repair. He explained that earlier in the year, staff recommended, <br />and the Council approved approximately $25,000 to be spent out of this fund to pay for the path <br />that was constructed along County Road I. <br />Director of Public Works Ulrich stated staff has requested the Finance Director to determine if <br />there are additional funds available to obtain the remaining $2,500 for the pavement survey. He <br />stated the Finance Director has indicated the trail along County Road I is a very good qualifier <br />for TIF funds, therefore, if the Council chooses to fund the trail with TIF, there would be <br />adequate funding available to pay for the survey. <br />Council Member Stigney inquired if this was TIF interest or actual TIF funds. Director of Public <br />Works Ulrich stated these would be actual TIF funds. <br />Council Member Thomason inquired regarding the life span of the pavement surveys. Director <br />of Public Works Ulrich stated this would depend upon the pavements and the maintenance <br />schedule. He explained that most cities rate their pavements every two years, or will attempt to <br />rate a quarter of the city every year, to provide for a two or four-year survey. <br />Council Member Thomason inquired if the pavement survey would be valid unti12002, and be <br />an accurate reflection of the road ratings, if it was conducted this year. <br />Director of Public Works Ulrich stated this was correct. He pointed out that if the survey was to <br />proceed at this time, it could be completed by the end of November. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Thomason/Quick. To Approve Staff's Recommendation to Take the Full <br />Amount of the Trail Funds From TIF, and Utilize $2,500 to Conduct a Pavement Survey. <br />Council Member Stigney clarified that the pavement survey funds were to come from TIF. <br />Mayor Coughlin requested clarification of the motion, and inquired if the motioner and seconder <br />intended the monies for the trail come out of TIF, as well as the funding for the pavement survey. <br />Council Member Thomason stated this was correct, exactly as recommended on the staff report. <br />Council Member Quick stated this was his understanding. <br />Finance Director Kessel advised the TIF funds are to be utilized for social and recreational <br />purposes, and inquired if the Council desired to take out the entire $27,000, or just $2,500 for the <br />• pavement survey. <br />Council Member Stigney advised staff was only requesting $2,500 for the pavement survey. <br />