Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council December 13, 1999 <br />Regular Meeting Page 14 <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated the first significant change is that driveway widths have been <br />removed from their currently obscure hiding place within the setback section of 1104.01, Subd. <br />• 4, and added to Section 1121.09, Subd. 1, "Dimensions" in a table. He indicated that The table <br />format is a new addition since Planning Commission forwarded this ordinance for Council <br />review-staff realized that in making the change to the R-1 district alone, driveway widths in <br />other residential districts had become undefined. <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated the ordinance creates a distinction between zero-lot line <br />subdivisions (separately owned side-by-side-twin homes) and duplexes, both of which are zoned <br />R-2. He advised that the Code currently allows properties in an R-2 district to have a 35-foot <br />wide driveway, however, because zero-lot line properties (such as the new twinhomes on Silver <br />Lake Road) are individual 50-foot wide parcels, the result could be 70 feet of driveway within <br />100 feet of the lot. He stated staff and the Planning Commission are confident that this was not <br />the intent of this provision when the Code was drafted. <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated the ordinance allows for wider driveways in an R-1 district, <br />increasing the maximum width from 35 feet to 3S feet or the width of the garage plus an <br />additional 12 feet. After much discussion, the Commission concluded that the 35-foot limitation <br />was too restrictive, especially for properties having wide three-car garages-the driveway could <br />not be as wide as the garage. This will resolve that, yet will also open the door for more cars on <br />a property and additional impervious surface. He explained that while both are legitimate <br />concerns, the Commission believed the benefits of the change outweighed the potential <br />environmental consequences and risk of abuse. <br />Planning Associate Encson stated it is possible that one other change could be made to the <br />ordinance, pertaining to Subdivision 4 of Section 1121.09, regarding angled parking dimensions. <br />Staff has become aware that the dimensions may be inaccurate, and do not take into <br />consideration other possible stall configurations. He indicated that staff will research this issue, <br />and if a change is necessary, will come back before the Council at their next meeting with a <br />revised angled parking dimension and graphic. He stated staff recommends the Council <br />introduce the first reading, and schedule the second reading of Ordinance 642. <br />There was no public input. <br />Mayor Coughlin closed the Public Hearing at 8:06 p.m. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Stigney. To Waive the Reading and Approve the First Reading of <br />Ordinance 642, an Ordinance Amending Title 1100, Chapters 1104, 1007, and 1121 of the <br />Mounds View Municipal Code Pertaining to Driveways and Curb Cuts; Special Planning Case <br />No. SP-074-99. <br />Council Member Marty stated he had spoken with Planning Associate Ericson regarding a <br />correction to the ordinance. He explained that in order to be consistent with the curb cut widths <br />listed on Page 4, the graph on Page 6, relating to zero lot line subdivisions, should be amended to <br />indicate 20 feet, rather than 18 feet. <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated this change would be made prior to the second reading of the <br />ordinance. <br />