My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-08-2007
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Charter Commission
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
Minutes
>
11-08-2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/18/2018 6:40:04 AM
Creation date
9/18/2018 6:39:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Minutes
GOVBOARD
Charter Commission
DOCTYPE
minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Administrative Offense Discussion Points <br /> • <br /> 1. Administrative Offenses that are certified to Property Taxes should be property-based. <br /> a. General consensus that agrees <br /> b. Language should clearly state that whenever authority is granted, it should specify <br /> for property-based offenses only. <br /> 2. Should there be a neutral arbitrator? <br /> a. Discussions with staff have led to the conclusion that a mechanism for a 3rd Party <br /> arbitrator should be in place but it should be optional to account for the extra cost <br /> which can be significant. <br /> b. We should be careful with language that requires the city to have a plan in place <br /> via resolution so that it can be easily edited and maintained versus detailed plans <br /> in the Charter. <br /> 3. Can a property owner request a fine be certified to his taxes immediately rather than paid <br /> in cash? <br /> a. More research is needed on this point but initially, it sounds applicable. <br /> 1111 <br /> 4. What should be the limit of total amount of fines certified rather than submitted to the <br /> Court and over what period of time should this be applied? <br /> a. Much more discussion is needed on this topic—options could include any of the <br /> following or a combination: <br /> i, One-time certification limit of no more than $X <br /> ii. Time period where further certifications for a single property are <br /> prohibited following a certification. <br /> iii. Aggregate total of dollars over a 12-month period of$X <br /> 5. Do we need to specify a minimum period of time between the receipt of a find and the <br /> certification of unpaid fines to taxes? <br /> a. Determined that a minimum period does not need to be specified as long as the <br /> language covered under item #4 is specific enough. <br /> 6. Do abatement costs need to be included with A. O. fines at the time of certification and <br /> should any limits on certification amounts specifically include or exclude abatement? <br /> a. Needs significantly more discussion with Staff and Commissioners regarding total <br /> dollar amounts under discussion and further research on the authority for <br /> certification of abatement costs. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.