My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-13-2007
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Charter Commission
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
Minutes
>
12-13-2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/18/2018 6:42:44 AM
Creation date
9/18/2018 6:42:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Minutes
GOVBOARD
Charter Commission
DOCTYPE
minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
should be noted that the maximum fine is now $1,000, an amount set by <br /> the state--not Mounds View--and if and when we amend the Code to <br /> update regarding AOs, we'll update that amount at the same time. <br /> 6. What is an Administrative Offense as opposed to a misdemeanor and when does it <br /> become a misdemeanor? We have language stating, "Any violation of this section <br /> constitutes a misdemeanor." This would seem to imply no difference at all. <br /> Correct. The AO process was intended to help expedite corrective action <br /> and to avoid having to send a resident to court in a different city just <br /> because they had some junk in the backyard or an unlicensed vehicle. <br /> This is even more of an issue today, in that I just received notice that due <br /> to the backlog of cases, court citations we wrote in October will not be <br /> heard by a judge until February. For violations which have not been <br /> resolved, waiting five months to have a judge order someone to clean <br /> their yard or remove a junk car is very frustrating, especially so for the <br /> neighbors who have to put up with the ongoing violations. That is why we <br /> use the AO process--to provide a more expedient citation review and <br /> resolution, a more convenient process, and a less expensive process. <br /> Toward that last point, given that the fines have not increased since their <br /> inception in the 1980s, and since the fines are generally ignored, we feel <br /> strongly that the new fine schedule and process for certifying unpaid <br /> property-based fines move forward. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.