My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-09-2009
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Charter Commission
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
Minutes
>
04-09-2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/18/2018 7:28:31 AM
Creation date
9/18/2018 7:28:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Minutes
DOCTYPE
minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Charter Commission Minutes <br /> • Thursday, April 9, 2009 <br /> 4) Are there ways to include public/private partnerships with city projects? <br /> 5) Can thresholds for project size be based on construction costs being a percentage of the city <br /> budget? <br /> a. General fund budget might be a likely target that would grow and contract with the <br /> economy. <br /> b. Could this percentage be used to define windows of whether petition size could be <br /> localized or city-wide. <br /> 6) How do you define a project area? <br /> a. Can precincts be used for smaller affected areas? <br /> b. Do smaller projects that go to petition to move themselves ahead of other priorities <br /> need to be a city wide petition? <br /> c. A smaller area is for petition only,not elections. <br /> 7) How do you determine the priority of a project? <br /> 8) Can or should petitions for initiative and referendum of the same project have different area <br /> definitions? ie, can a city wide referendum kill a local area initiative? <br /> 9) How does financing come into play on project areas? <br /> 10)What projects do we want to include in this section? <br /> a. Should we limit it to current language of street projects? <br /> b. We should avoid a"list"of potential projects <br /> Chair clarified that despite the perception that a small number of people on a petition are <br /> deciding issues for the whole community, a project could only go forward if approved by the <br /> City Council or by a city-wide vote. <br /> If done properly,the charter model should make everyone's job easier from both the resident and <br /> city side of any particular issue. <br /> City staff can provide assistance on terminology that already has accepted definitions in order to <br /> build proper language. <br /> 8. New Business <br /> Discussion of next month's agenda includes continuing work on Chapter 8, discussion of the <br /> materials provided regarding the Clerk-Administrator title and possibly further discussion on the <br /> language conflicts regarding the PCSC and the EDC. <br /> 9. Adjournment <br /> Meeting adjourned at 8:40 p.m. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.