Laserfiche WebLink
-APPROVED- <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Schiltgen/Chair Stevenson. To Table Action on the <br />Variance for a 30’ Front Yard Setback at 7790 Eastwood Road; Planning Case No. VR2016-004 <br />to the October 5, 2016 Planning Commission Meeting. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 2 Nays – 3 (Klebsch, Klander and French) Motion failed. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Commissioner Klebsch/Commissioner French. To approve Resolution <br />1055-16, a Resolution Denying of a Variance for a 30’ Front Yard Setback at 7790 Eastwood <br />Road; Planning Case No. VR2016-004. <br /> <br />Commissioner Schiltgen expressed frustration that the Planning Commission did not have a full <br />complement of the Planning Commission to take action on this item. <br /> <br />Commissioner Klebsch did not believe Items E and F were being met with the variance request. <br />She wanted to respect the comments presented by the neighbors on this block and believed the <br />variance request could be minimized. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 2 Nays – 3 (Stevenson, Schiltgen and Klander) Motion failed. <br /> <br />Mr. Ollestad discussed how his plans for the home would have to change noting the price would <br />have to increase dramatically if the 54-foot increase was required. He stated he was only <br />proposing to build a 2,000 square foot home. He provided further comment on the concerns <br />expressed by the neighbors. <br /> <br />Commissioner Schiltgen requested further information on the 60-day rule. Planner Sevald <br />explained State Statute would allow the City to extend this request from 60 days to 120 days in <br />order for the Commission to review the matter again in October with a full membership of the <br />Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson questioned how the Commission should proceed at this time. City <br />Administrator Ericson explained the Commission has taken no action either for or against the <br />Variance at this time due to the fact none of the votes have passed. He stated it wouldn’t be <br />inappropriate for the Commission to reconsider tabling action on the Variance. <br /> <br />Commissioner Schiltgen supported the Variance being tabled and wished staff had proposed the <br />120 days from the start of the meeting. <br /> <br />City Administrator Ericson commented the Planning Commission could elect to take no action <br />on the Variance and this direction would be forwarded to the City Council as such. He <br />recommended that the item be extended to 120 days in order for proper action to be taken on the <br />matter. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson supported the Commission taking no action on this item and recommended the <br />item be extended to 120 days. <br />