My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-01-2007 AO Discussion Points - City Response
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Charter Commission
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
Correspondence
>
12-01-2007 AO Discussion Points - City Response
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2018 5:26:05 AM
Creation date
10/10/2018 5:26:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Misc Documentation
Date
12/1/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
should be noted that the maximum fine is now $1,000, an amount set by <br />the state--not Mounds View--and if and when we amend the Code to <br />update regarding AOs, we'll update that amount at the same time. <br /> <br />6. What is an Administrative Offense as opposed to a misdemeanor and when does it <br />become a misdemeanor? We have language stating, “Any violation of this section <br />constitutes a misdemeanor.” This would seem to imply no difference at all. <br /> <br />Correct. The AO process was intended to help expedite corrective action <br />and to avoid having to send a resident to court in a different city just <br />because they had some junk in the backyard or an unlicensed vehicle. <br />This is even more of an issue today, in that I just received notice that due <br />to the backlog of cases, court citations we wrote in October will not be <br />heard by a judge until February. For violations which have not been <br />resolved, waiting five months to have a judge order someone to clean <br />their yard or remove a junk car is very frustrating, especially so for the <br />neighbors who have to put up with the ongoing violations. That is why we <br />use the AO process--to provide a more expedient citation review and <br />resolution, a more convenient process, and a less expensive process. <br />Toward that last point, given that the fines have not increased since their <br />inception in the 1980s, and since the fines are generally ignored, we feel <br />strongly that the new fine schedule and process for certifying unpaid <br />property-based fines move forward. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.