My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1995/03/08
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
Agenda Packets - 1995/03/08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:49 PM
Creation date
11/27/2018 1:32:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
3/8/1995
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
3/8/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Page 5 <br />SECTION II - METHODS OF ASSESSMENT <br />The nature of an improvement determines the method of assessment. The objective is <br />to choose an assessment method which will arrive at a reasonable, fair and equitable <br />assessment which will be uniform upon the same class of property within the assessed <br />area. The most frequently recognized assessment methods are: the unit assessment, <br />the front footage assessment and the area assessment. Depending upon the individual <br />project, any one or a combination of these methods may be utilized to arrive at an <br />appropriate cost distribution. City staff will consider all methods and weigh their <br />applicability to the project and present a recommendation to the City Council in the form <br />of a mock assessment roll (or rolls). A description of each assessment and its <br />corresponding policy application is presented. A separate section (Section III) will <br />identify the appropriate matchup of method with a specific type of project and analyze <br />why each is generally used. <br />a. Unit Assessment. A unit assessment shall be derived by dividing the total <br />project cost by the number of Residential Equivalent Density (RED) units <br />in the project area. A RED unit is defined as a single family residential unit. <br />All platted and unplatted property will assigned RED unit values equivalent <br />to the underlying zoning. When the existing land use is less than the <br />highest and best permitted use, the Council may consider the current use <br />as well as the full potential of land use in determining the appropriate <br />number of RED units. Otherwise, the following RED chart will apply on aPerunitbasis, subject to adjustment by the Council for any inequities: <br />Single Family <br />Duplex <br />Condominium <br />Multifamily (3 units or more) <br />Townhouse <br />Commercial <br />Industrial <br />1.00 RED <br />1.00 RED <br />0.80 RED <br />0.80 RED <br />0.80 RED <br />2:00 Units <br />2.00 Units <br />The unit approach has proven to be the best method in those instances <br />whereby the improvement largely benefits everyone to the same degree <br />and the cost of the improvement is not generally affected by parcel size.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.