Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission January 16, 2019 <br />Regular Meeting Page 3 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />ditch and how water was flowing through the property. He noted the deepest lots would be used <br />for the stormwater pond. <br /> <br />Ms. Yoder-Fox commented she had many concerns with respect to the stormwater pond and <br />stated her lot would be adjacent to this pond. She requested consideration be made for the <br />people already occupying the adjacent lots. She indicated stormwater ponds do not increase <br />property value. She commented further on the nuisances that were created by stormwater ponds <br />such as algae blooms. She inquired who would own the stormwater pond and who would be <br />responsible for maintaining it. Mr. Harstad stated he respected the concerns of Ms. Yoder-Fox <br />and noted he would be hiring qualified engineers to assist him with this project, while also <br />having DNR, watershed and City oversight. He reported stormwater ponds were required in <br />every new development in the Twin Cities. He explained a maintenance agreement would have <br />to be worked out with the City. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Sevald explained the preliminary plat has yet to be designed <br />and noted the developer was uncertain if this would be a wet or dry stormwater pond. <br /> <br />Ms. Yoder-Fox stated she would save her questions regarding the stormwater pond for the <br />preliminary plat review. She expressed concern about having a wet pond that holds water for <br />more than two days behind her home. She stated these types of stormwater ponds are toxic and <br />can be mosquito magnets. She feared that the proposed stormwater pond would overflow and <br />could flood her home. She urged the Planning Commission and City staff to ensure that the <br />stormwater pond was designed and engineered properly. <br /> <br />Dan Madsen, 8206 Long Lake Road, explained he also had concerns with the stormwater pond. <br />He provided the Commission with handouts that addressed these concerns. He reported soils can <br />be contaminated from stormwater ponds or if not properly maintained can flood the <br />neighborhood. He encouraged the City to have a great maintenance plan in place for more than <br />10 years for this stormwater pond. He recommended City staff speak with the City of Roseville <br />regarding their stormwater ponds. <br /> <br />Joel Holl, 2573 Sherwood Road, commented on the lots he owns and noted they were purchased <br />for wildlife and privacy purposes. He explained he did not want to develop his land. He <br />expressed frustration with the fact the developer was trying to push a road through on his land. <br />He encouraged the developer to seek another access point to this development. He stated he <br />feared how his land and the existing wildlife would be impacted by the proposed development. <br />In addition, he liked his privacy and he did not want another home close to his property. <br /> <br />Chair Stevenson asked if this road were to go through, how much of Mr. Holl’s land would be <br />lost. Mr. Holl anticipated he would lose 15 feet on the front of his lot. Mr. Harstad commented <br />further on the easements the City already had in place. <br /> <br />Tom Delich, 2581 Sherwood Road, expressed concern that his home’s property value would be <br />adversely impacted. He explained the new homes would be valued far higher than his. He stated <br />he was also concerned with the fact he would have a new road going along the side of his