My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 05-EDA199
MoundsView
>
City Council
>
EDA
>
Resolutions
>
2005
>
Resolution 05-EDA199
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2022 11:17:04 AM
Creation date
6/2/2008 3:30:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV EDA
EDA Document Type
Resolutions
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mounds View EDA January 14, 2005 <br />Special Meeting Page 2 <br />aspect of the signs. <br />Economic Development Director Backman stated that they would also be evaluating the leases. <br />Commissioner Flaherty asked whether they would also value what Clear Channel would require <br />of the City to get out of the lease. <br />Economic Development Director Backman stated that they would be looking at a variety of <br />aspects, and that is why they were interacting with Kennedy and Graven as well. <br />President Marty asked whether the signs were being looked at individually since there was <br />speculation that possibly all the signs would not have to go. <br />Economic Development Director Backman stated that he had asked for proposals on one, two, <br />and all six billboards. <br />President Marty asked if the appraisal would look at each sign's purported value and the cost of <br />the signs themselves. <br />Economic Development Director Backman stated that it would be both. <br />Vice President Stigney asked whether Clear Channel had come out with any figures or whether <br />they were going to. <br />Economic Development Director Backman stated that he would have to defer to City Attorney <br />Riggs on that issue. <br />City Attorney Riggs stated that the discussions hadn't gone that far. He stated that they had <br />information from Clear Channel showing what they had spent on the signs, what they believe the <br />income will be, and what they believe the City will received from the signs, so they had a pretty <br />good baseline. He stated that he assumed that they would do something like that. <br />Vice President Stigney asked what the next step would be. <br />City Attorney Riggs stated it would be to figure out what signs could remain or be relocated so <br />that Clear Channel is still happy, and so the City and the EDA can move forward with the <br />project. <br />Vice President Stigney asked whether all the bases were being covered by this appraisal or <br />whether something else would need to be done in the future. <br />City Attorney Riggs stated that conceivably something could come up, but that this would <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.