My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-13-2018
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Economic Development Authority
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
08-13-2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 9:16:00 AM
Creation date
5/14/2019 2:35:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
Economic Development Authority
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
8/13/2018
Commission Doc Number (Ord & Res)
0
Supplemental fields
Date
8/13/2018
EDA Document Type
Council Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Nagell Appraisal Incorporated | 952.544.8966 Page 65 <br /> <br />RECONCILIATION <br /> <br />Indicated Value by Cost Approach Not Applied <br />Indicated Value by Sales Comparison Approach See below <br />Indicated Value by Income Approach Not Applied <br /> <br />The Cost Approach to value was considered less reliable due to subjective depreciation adjustments <br />and was therefore not applied. <br /> <br />The Direct Sales Comparison Approach to value analyzed recent sales of commercial land as <br />compared with the characteristics of the subject pr operty. Adjustments were made to the comparables to <br />make them as similar to the subject as possible. This results in an indication of market value at which a <br />typical buyer would be willing to pay for the subject property. <br /> <br />The Income Approach is typically preferred for income-producing properties. Vacant development land <br />is rarely leased in the market; this approach was not considered reliable and was therefore not applied. <br /> <br /> <br />Conclusion: The sales comparison approach was considered the most relevant approach to value. <br />Therefore, the following values are concluded for each of the city’s scenarios: <br /> <br />Note: The estimated $110,000 +/- should be deducted from each value below to account for the non- <br />market cost to relocate the road. <br /> <br /> <br />Final Value Opinion – 135-Unit Apartment (100% <br />multifamily) $1,750,000 <br />Final Value Opinion – 63-Unit Apartment with Kwik <br />Trip <br />$820,000 Apartments + <br />$620,000 Kwik Trip = <br />$1,440,000 <br />Final Value Opinion – 63-Unit Apartment with General <br />Commercial <br />$820,000 Apartments + <br />$750,000 Commercial = <br />$1,570,000 <br />Final Value Opinion – 100% Commercial <br />Development $1,550,000 <br /> <br />NOTE: Typically, unstable, distressed, properties with unusual conditions and/or motivated sellers tend <br />to sell below market value. Based on market observations and discussions with various market experts, <br />discounts can range from 10%-50%+. <br /> <br />EXPOSURE TIME / MARKETING TIME <br /> <br />Reasonable Exposure Time: Typically 12 months before <br />the effective date of the appraisal. <br />Marketing Time Opinion: 6 to 18 months or less after the <br />effective date of the appraisal. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.