My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-11-2019
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Economic Development Authority
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
03-11-2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 9:14:58 AM
Creation date
5/14/2019 2:51:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
Economic Development Authority
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
3/11/2019
Commission Doc Number (Ord & Res)
0
Supplemental fields
Date
3/11/2019
EDA Document Type
Council Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The Mounds View Vision <br />A Thriving Desirable Community <br /> <br /> <br />Item No: 6B <br />Meeting Date: March 11, 2019 <br />Type of Business: EDA Business <br />Administrator Review: ____ <br />City of Mounds View Staff Report <br />To: EDA President and Commissioners <br />From: Brian Beeman, Assistant City Administrator <br />Item Title/Subject: Broker Fees – Keller Williams <br /> <br />Introduction: <br />It is common for Cities and Counties to pay broker fees when a real estate salesperson <br />brings forward a credible prospect for the development or redevelopment of publicly <br />owned property. The broker fee is commonly referred to as a finder’s fee. It is less <br />common for EDA’s to enter into exclusive listing agreements. Although, some EDA’s have <br />chosen to enter into exclusive agreements on distressed properties especially during the <br />Great Recession to help sell industrial lots etc. normally, the fee wouldn’t be paid unless <br />the EDA enters into a formal purchase and development agreement with a credible <br />developer. <br /> <br />There are two types of listing agreements, exclusive and non-exclusive. An exclusive <br />listing agreement obligates the EDA to one brokerage firm who markets the site and <br />collects a brokerage fee on the percent of sales of the total land price. This excludes other <br />real estate firms from collecting a fee even if they are successful in bringing a prospect to <br />the EDA. In that case, the exclusive firm would have to negotiate a fee amount amongst <br />the other broker themselves from the EDA’s paid fee. <br /> <br />A non-exclusive agreement means the EDA will pay any brokerage firm a fee or <br />percentage of the project for successfully bringing forward a credible prospect who ends <br />up signing a purchase and development agreement. The negative of this type of <br />agreement is that many real estate firms won’t spend a lot of time on calling prospects if <br />they are not exclusive to the EDA. The positive is that any real estate firm can bring <br />forward a prospect and expect to get paid by the EDA. Another commonly used document <br />is a one-time showing agreement. This is used when a broker brings a prospect to the <br />EDA and is only good for that particular prospect. This protects the broker so they can <br />get paid if the prospect signs with the EDA and it expires after an agreed deadline. By <br />statute, the EDA must have an agreement with a broker in order to legally pay a broker <br />fee. Sometimes the EDA will pay half of the broker’s fee and the developer will pay the <br />other half and other times the developer will pay 100% of the broker’s fees. There are <br />many ways to negotiate and structure the fees. <br /> <br />Discussion: <br />Gregory Rance of Keller Williams Commercial has contacted City staff and is asking that <br />the EDA consider entering into an exclusive agreement to market to developers and find <br />users for the Skyline Motel redevelopment site. Essentially, KW would help to market the <br />site and if the EDA chooses to sign a purchase and development agreement with one of <br />the developers that KW brought forward through their marketing efforts then the EDA <br />would be obligated to pay a percentage of the sale of land to KW. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.