Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Charter Commission Minutes <br />Wednesday, October 13, 2010 <br /> <br />1. Call to Order – The meeting came to order at 7:03 pm. <br /> <br />2. Roll Call – Present: J. Thomas, B. Thomas, J. Miller, B. Doty, B. Amundsen, Susan Hutchins, <br />J. Battin, J. Reiling <br /> Excused: M. Haubrich <br /> Absent: <br /> <br />3. Approval of agenda <br /> Motion by B. Amundsen, second by J Miller, to approve agenda as written. <br />MOTION APPROVED <br /> <br /> Approval of minutes <br /> Motion by B. Doty, second by B. Amundsen, to approve minutes of Sept. 8, 2010 as amended. <br />MOTION APPROVED <br /> <br />4. Citizens comments from the floor <br />Acknowledged Councilmember Carol Mueller present. <br /> <br />5. Reports of the Chair <br /> Chair opened discussion of Commission Bylaws and the restrictions on officer positions as well <br />as the need to hold Commission officer elections. <br /> <br />6. Reports of members <br />B. Amundsen asked whether the minutes posted on the city website are the amended and <br />approved versions or the pre-approved submittals. Chair responded that he believes they are the <br />pre-approved format but will check with staff. <br /> <br />J. Reiling requested minutes to be distributed to Commissioners a bit sooner. <br /> <br />B. Amundsen reminded those viewing the broadcast from home that Election Day is Nov. 2nd. <br />Chair added that sample ballots are available on the city website as well as from staff if residents <br />want to prepare in advance. <br /> <br />7. Unfinished Business <br />Chair opened discussion of Chapter 8 by discussing conversations with staff and that the term the <br />city uses for segmented projects (continued through multiple years) is “phases”. <br /> <br />B. Thomas introduced new draft language for 8.01 and explained that it’s not a complete draft <br />due to two outstanding questions with regard to intent: does separating the public improvement <br />and special assessment language into two sentences actually comprise the commissions <br />discussions thus far and does the commission have any understanding by what is meant by the <br />phrase, “of a local character.” Discussion on those concerns and draft language continued. <br /> <br />Chair suggested new wording. B. Amundsen also suggested wording that would include “local <br />improvement” with “public improvement” defined with a statutory reference. B. Doty explained <br />that “of local character” was meant to continue the general atmosphere and appearance during a <br />local improvement project. He went on to describe why the language limits on assessment <br />collections. Discussion of financing improvements continued. <br />