My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-16-2017 Agenda and Packet
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
11-16-2017 Agenda and Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2024 1:27:58 PM
Creation date
1/27/2020 8:53:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
quality tree inventory. For community trees that are not listed in a tree inventory, this information can most <br />readily be obtained through a ground survey. Accurately determining tree age may not be possible, but for the <br />purposes of evaluation, it will usually suffice to group trees into broad age classes. <br />4. Promote conservation of tree resources. <br />The benefits derived from the urban forest generally increase as tree size and canopy cover increase. <br />Therefore, it is in the best interest of the community to protect its existing tree resources from loss or <br />depletion. It is not possible to indefinitely preserve individual trees, since each tree will eventually die. <br />However, it is possible to preserve both the urban forest and natural woodlands by restricting the <br />indiscriminate removal of trees in all age classes, and by making provisions for natural or human -assisted <br />regeneration. This embodies the concept of conservation. <br />®rdinance provisions <br />Many jurisdictions have attempted to address this goal with provisions that require approval to remove certain <br />classes of trees under certain conditions. Unfortunately, in focusing solely on the "preservation" of individual <br />trees, conservation of tree and forest resources is often overlooked. For instance, some ordinances have <br />focused on protection during new construction, but make no provisions to ensure that trees will receive <br />proper care or be retained after construction is completed. <br />In areas with native tree resources, ordinance provisions chat address this goal should conserve stands of trees <br />rather than only individual tree specimens. They should prevent depletion of the tree canopy over both short- <br />term and long-term time horizons. Finally, they should set basic performance standards for the amount of tree <br />canopy to be retained or achieved. Provisions related to the development of a master plan, and those <br />regulating tree planting, protection, and removal are most directly related to this goal. <br />Conservation of tree resources alone may not be sufficient to address situations that requtre a more <br />comprehensive resource management perspective. When jurisdictions seek to conserve fund onal forest and <br />woodland ecosystems, such as in wildland parks or open spaces, the scope of management may need to be <br />expanded. Other components of the plant community, wildlife, natural processes such as fire and flooding, <br />and human land uses may also need to be considered. <br />Specific provisions: <br />o Designate adminishative resuonsibitities <br />o Develop a comprehensive management plan <br />o Resolution of conflicts between trees and structures <br />o Planting requirements <br />o Permit required for activities that may damage city owned trees <br />o Permit required for activities that may damage protected private trees <br />o Conservation of forest and woodland resources during development <br />If the approach used to attain [his goal involves tree protection or "preservation", it will be necessuy to have <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.