My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2007-03-12 City Attorney Memo to Commission re Oath of Office
MoundsView
>
City Commissions
>
Charter Commission
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
Correspondence
>
2007-03-12 City Attorney Memo to Commission re Oath of Office
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2020 4:59:45 AM
Creation date
1/29/2020 4:59:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Misc Documentation
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
307715v2 LKT MU210-4 <br />and Oregon hold the filing requirement is not a condition precedent to assuming the duties of office. <br />I was unable to find any cases that found in favor of the party claiming a violation of filing and oath <br />requirements. <br /> <br /> If the City chooses to change the language, no disruption to the effectiveness of the Charter <br />should occur. In addition, as an alternative to “verified by oath”, altenative language could be <br />“verified by affidavit” which would be consistent with Minnesota Statutes § 410.12, subd. 2 as to <br />petitions to amend a charter. If the City chooses to keep the language as it now reads, it appears <br />unlikely that any action against the “oath” requirement will be successful (although it may consume <br />City resources). <br /> <br /> Please let me know if you require further review or discussion concerning this matter. <br /> <br />SJR:jms <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.