Laserfiche WebLink
process prescribed by Minnesota State Statutes, it would not pose an undue burden on <br />the court. <br />CONCLUSION <br />By proceeding in the manner in which the Mayor and the City Council have, the <br />City of Mounds View has acted arbitrarily and capriciously in determining what might <br />be in the City's best interests. State statute has not been followed and Mounds View <br />residents, and the Mounds View Charter Commission on behalf the residents', have not <br />been afforded opportunity to properly review, discuss and offer input into possible <br />changes in their form of Charter and governmental operation. Accordingly, Plaintiffs <br />request that the Court issue a temporary injunction preventing the City of Mounds View <br />from allowing Ordinances 661 and 662 being placed on a ballot offered to the residents <br />of the City of Mounds View until the Mounds View Charter Commission is afforded <br />opportunity to review and consider the issues being proposed in Ordinances 661 and <br />662, in accordance with Minn. Stat. Section 410.12, Subd. 5, and at such time as this <br />process is complete, that any proposed Ordinances or Charter amendments be placed <br />on the ballot for consideration. <br />Respectfully submitted on behalf of The Mounds View Charter Commission By. <br />Dated: This�Day of October, 2000 <br />Jonathan J Th as <br />Memorandum Page 6 of 6 <br />