Laserfiche WebLink
5. The contents of the amendments proposed by Ordinances 661 and 662 were <br />never discussed during any City Council meetings or work sessions, nor was <br />the Charter Commission allowed the time for review and therefore procedure, <br />pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 410.12, Subd.4., was not followed by <br />the City of Mounds View. <br />WHEREFORE Plaintiffs request the following relief: <br />1. That this Court issue a mandatory injunction directing the City of Mounds View <br />to submit the Ordinances 661 and 662 to the Charter Commission for review <br />and comment prior to presenting them to the voters of the City of Mounds <br />View. <br />2. That the City of Mounds View be enjoined from placing Ordinances 661 and <br />662 on the ballot for the November 7, 2000 General Election. <br />3. For such further relief as is just and equitable. <br />Respectfully submitted on behalf of The Mounds View Charter Commission By: <br />Dated: This � Day of October, 2000 <br />ACKNOWLEDGMENT <br />Pursuant to Minn. Stat. Section 549.21, Subd.1, the undersigned hereby <br />acknowledges that pursuant to Minn. Stat. Section 549.21, Subd.2, costs, <br />disbursements and reasonable attorney and witness fees may be awarded the <br />opposing party or parties in this litigation if the court should find that the <br />undersigned acted in bad faith, asserted a claim or defense that is frivolous and that <br />is costly to the other party, asserted an unfounded position solely to delay the <br />ordinary course of the proceedings or to harass, or committed a fraud upon the court. <br />Respectfully submitted on behalf of The Mounds View Charter Commission By: <br />Dated: This 2 LL Day of October, 2000 <br />Jonathan J T omas <br />