Laserfiche WebLink
STATE OF MINNESOTA <br />COUNTY OF RAMSEY <br />DISTRICT COURT <br />SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT <br />Civil Division <br />City of Mounds View Charter Court File No., c Y d 0 �7 1,6 ?S <br />Commission, Julie Olsen, Willard C Doty, <br />Jean Miller, Jonathan J Thomas, et al., <br />Plaintiffs, <br />VS. <br />City of Mounds View, a Minnesota <br />Municipal Corporation, <br />Defendant <br />STATEMENT OF FACTS <br />MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN <br />SUPPORT OF MOTUON <br />Plaintiffs in this action are residents of the City of Mounds View and members of the <br />Mounds View Charter Commission, appointed by Ramsey County District Judge to act <br />in such capacity. <br />Defendant City of Mounds View is a Minnesota municipal corporation, a "home rule <br />charter city" pursuant to definition set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 410, <br />specifically 410.015 Definitions relating to cities. <br />Defendant City of Mounds View has prepared Ordinance No. 661, which proposes to <br />amend various chapters of the Mounds View City Charter relating to a City Manager <br />form of government and Ordinance No. 662, which proposes to amend Chapter 2 of the <br />Mounds View City Charter, changing the term of office of Mayor from two (2) to four (4) <br />years, and the City Council of the City of Mounds View is intending to submit <br />Ordinance No. 661 and Ordinance No. 662 to City voters at the upcoming November 7, <br />2000, General Election pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 410.12, subd. 4. <br />ISSUE <br />1. Did the City of Mounds View act outside what is allowed by law in it's action <br />rejecting a 90 day extension for review of Ordinances 661 and 662 by the <br />Mounds View Charter Commission, and it's subsequent action to submit said <br />Ordinances 661 and 662 to City voters at the upcoming November 7, 2000 <br />General Election. The Mounds View City Council did not follow procedure(s) set <br />forth in Minnesota Statutes 1998, Chapter 410.12, Subdivision 5? <br />