My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Council Resolutions Referencing the Charter
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Charter Commission
>
Charter and Amendments
>
Related Documents
>
Council Resolutions Referencing the Charter
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2020 11:37:30 AM
Creation date
2/6/2020 11:11:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Charter Commission
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The orders of the city council as to which the referendum is sought in the case at bar <br />• are clearly executive and not legislative in their nature. A direction to an officer to <br />sign a specified contract with a named person to do a defined thing for a specified <br />price is not a legislative act... It is not the ling down of a rule, a principle or a law <br />by which the conduct of a public officer may be guided. <br />Id. (emphasis added). General legislative acts lay down some permanent and uniform rule of law, <br />administrative acts relate to daily administration of municipal affairs, and quasi-judicial acts are <br />the product of investigation, consideration and deliberate human judgment based upon <br />evidentiary facts of some sort. Hanson, 529 N.W.2d at 488. <br />The Mounds View City Council adopted an ordinance authorizing the conveyance of real <br />property from the City to the EDA. Although Minnesota courts have not directly held that the <br />sale of real property is an administrative, rather than a legislative act, the case law strongly <br />supports this argument. As an administrative act, the sale of property is not subject to <br />referendum. <br />Moreover, the ordinance authorizing the sale is an ordinance authorizing a contract for the <br />conveyance of property. And, courts have held that entering into a contract is an administrative <br />act. The sale of property does not establish a permanent or uniform rule of law; rather, it is an <br />administrative act that is part of the day-to-day business activities of the City. Also, the fact that <br />the Council authorized the sale by ordinance should not change the conclusion. In the Oakman <br />A& case, the city adopted an ordinance approving a settlement and the court, nonetheless, held that <br />the ordinance was the exercise of an administrative function. If administrative acts, such as the <br />sale of property, were subject to referendum, it would defeat not only the purpose of referendum, <br />but make it highly impractical and inefficient for the City to conduct its daily business affairs. <br />• <br />Under the case law, a court would likely find that the sale of real property is an administrative, <br />not a legislative, act. Thus, the ordinance authorizing the sale is not subject to referendum and <br />the City Council may deny the sufficiency of a petition on this basis. <br />H. State Law Allows the City to Convey Property Without Regard to City Charter <br />Provisions. <br />Two state statutes provide support for this argument. <br />A. Minn. Stat. § 471.64. <br />The first statute, Minn. Stat. § 471.64, authorizes the City to enter into a contract for the sale of <br />real property to another political subdivision without regard to charter provisions: <br />Any county, city, town, ... or other political subdivision of the state may enter into <br />any contract with ... any other political subdivision of the state for the purchase, <br />lease, sale, ... of real property, without regard to statutory or charter provisions ... <br />SJR -268835v3 <br />MU205-30 <br />A-3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.