My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/22/1990
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
03/22/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2020 2:42:20 PM
Creation date
4/13/2020 1:21:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
Documnet Type
Packet
Supplemental fields
Date
3/22/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Let's talk about economic development.... <br />16. If the City were to attract more <br />development, what kind would you <br />most prefer: single family <br />houses, multiple unit housing, <br />commercial, retail, or light <br />industrial? <br />SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES..50% <br />MULTI -UNIT HOUSING ..... 5% <br />COMMERCIAL ............ 15% <br />RETAIL.................5% <br />LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ...... 16% <br />NONE OF ABOVE (VOL) .... 4% <br />DON'T KNOW/REFUSED..... 5% <br />17. Are there any areas of the city in which you would favor re- <br />development -- replacing existing structures with newer or <br />different ones? (IF "YES," ASK:) Where? <br />DON'T KNOW, 9%; NONE, 72%; ALONG HIGHWAY 10, 5%; COUNTY ROAD <br />I, 2%; APARTMENTS, 3%; TRAILER COURT, 2%; BARS, 2%; <br />SCATTERED, 5%. <br />18. What type of development would <br />you most favor along Highway 10 <br />between County Road I and the <br />Spring Lake Park border -- single <br />family houses, multiple unit <br />housing, commercial, retail, or <br />light industrial? <br />SINGLE FAMILY HOUSES..19% <br />MULTI -UNIT HOUSING ..... <br />7% <br />COMMERCIAL ............ <br />25% <br />RETAIL................15% <br />LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ...... <br />22% <br />NONE OF ABOVE (VOL) .... <br />6% <br />DON'T KNOW/REFUSED..... <br />7% <br />The Highway 10 frontage west of County Road I is almost all <br />single lot ownership. In order to encourage quality development <br />in the area, the combining of lots into larger sites might be <br />necessary. In order to be sure that the development meets the <br />desires of the community, the City may need to be involved in the <br />purchase of these individual lots. <br />19. Would you support the active YES...................49% <br />involvement of the city, both NO....................34% <br />financially and in the expend- DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.... 17% <br />iture of staff time, in putting <br />together large development sites <br />along Highway 10? <br />20. Would you support the City's YES...................39% <br />use of their condemnation NO....................46% <br />authority to accomplish the DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.... 15% <br />purchase of single parcels in <br />order to create larger develop- <br />ment sites? <br />21. Were you aware that the City <br />has a community land use plan <br />called the "Comprehensive <br />Plan"? <br />3 <br />YES...................28% <br />NO....................72% <br />DON'T KNOW/REFUSED..... 0% <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.