My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08/16/1990
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
08/16/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2020 2:47:03 PM
Creation date
4/13/2020 1:25:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
Documnet Type
Packet
Supplemental fields
Date
8/16/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Advantages: <br />1. Pooling -offers flexibility in assigning work tasks because a <br />cross department assures that each employee can perform the <br />necessary maintenance functions to run the city. <br />2. Employees develop skills in multi -divisions with Public Works. <br />Disadvantages: <br />1. Lack of consistency in parks maintenance due to a routine task <br />being performed by different employees over time. <br />2. In a pool system parks could be considered a lower priority <br />resulting in a delay in routine maintenance tasks until other <br />pooled projects are complete. <br />#3. MAINTAIN THE PUBLIC WORKS FORCE AS CURRENTLY STRUCTURED <br />Advantages: <br />1. The cost of the Public Works Department would remain basically <br />the same. <br />Disadvantages: <br />1. Increased expectations requires increased production and as <br />timespent predictions will show, an increase in employee hours is <br />necessary to accomplish the level of service maintenance requested <br />in the parks. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.