My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/27/1994
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1994
>
01/27/1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2020 2:51:20 PM
Creation date
4/13/2020 1:30:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
Documnet Type
Packet
Supplemental fields
Date
1/27/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6 3. evidence of the need for financial assistance to meet start-up costs that would be <br />entailed in providing the combined service or function. Explain why existing <br />resources, or projected program savings, cannot be used for the start-up costs. <br />Senior citizen services do not exist currently in two of the communities and there are <br />no fund balances which could be used to initiate the services. Without the grant <br />dollars, all additional costs for this service would need to be covered by raising <br />property taxes. Although the projected tax increases for this project are modest, total <br />new takes for area residents are significant when combined with other additional <br />increases such as MWCC sewer rate increases, recycling fee increases and school <br />district levy increases. In a December 1991 survey of individuals hum the four <br />comtmrriuities, the acceptability of the Regional Senior Center project went down as <br />the level of proposed additional taxes to pay for it increased. While the grant will <br />not guarantee the participation of all four cities in this project, it will certainly serve <br />to encourage it. <br />There will not be projected program savings to use for the start-up costs since the <br />actual spending levels will be increased, however the four cities will have the benefit <br />of much greater senior services and an efficient service delivery system. The cost <br />for the regional services will be significantly less than what each community would <br />spend providing comparable services independently. <br />7. List the desired outcomes from the proposed shared services agreement? <br />1. To provide a multipurpose senior citizen's center which is needed for more than just <br />the programming. Existing facilities in the participating communities impose severe <br />limitations or are non-existent. <br />2. To provide better and more diverse program offerings than could be provided in any <br />one of the four communities. <br />3. To extend service days and hours by optimizing the use of senior resources. <br />4. To offer programs to a broad pool of regional seniors that will allow for establishment <br />of programs that would not ordinarily be run in any individual community. <br />5. To provide services that will help keep more senior citizens living independently for <br />a longer period of time, rather than being cared for in a nursing home. <br />6. To be consistent with the statewide trend towards consolidation of government <br />services. <br />7. To avoid duplication of expenditures for senior center facilities and equipment among <br />our four communities. <br />8. To improve the quality of life for seniors living in our four communities. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.