My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2020/06/22
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2020
>
Agenda Packets - 2020/06/22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:48:35 PM
Creation date
7/20/2020 11:51:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
6/22/2020
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
6/22/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council June 8, 2020 <br />Regular Meeting Page 10 <br /> <br />City Administrator Zikmund stated this was being driven by a change from the original proposal. 1 <br />He explained the change was the ditch running through the existing property was being proposed 2 <br />to be piped. However, the watershed district has denied this request. This denial would require 3 <br />the developer to run all stormwater into a pond for treatment, which will expand the ponding by 4 <br />40%. He explained after speaking with the City Attorney regarding this matter he argued there 5 <br />was a legitimate reason to have all 14 properties participating in these improvements. He indicated 6 <br />it would cost more for the City to install the storm water but the City would then control this utility, 7 <br />while also being able to assess across all 14 property owners. 8 <br /> 9 <br />Council Member Gunn requested further information regarding the term “treated”. Public Works 10 <br />Director Peterson explained treated stormwater meant rain water was running into a pond to 11 <br />eliminate some of the sediment while also holding it back before running downstream. 12 <br /> 13 <br />Council Member Meehlhause stated the City would have the responsibility for maintaining this 14 <br />pond. Public Works Director Peterson reported this would be the case. 15 <br /> 16 <br />Council Member Bergeron commented he was concerned with the fact this project was proposed 17 <br />one way and now that was changing and the City would have to pick up more of the burden. He 18 <br />indicated water was a huge issue for this project. He feared that the developer had not done his 19 <br />due diligence and this burden was now falling on the City. He stated he tremendously opposed 20 <br />this request. 21 <br /> 22 <br />City Administrator Zikmund reported Mr. Harstad had a wetland delineation completed prior to 23 <br />moving forward this project and no wetland was reported. However, after further review a small 24 <br />wetland was found. He indicated the Rice Creek Watershed also denied the proposal from the City 25 <br />with Stantec to put the ditch into a pipe. He explained Mr. Harstad was not requesting additional 26 <br />money from the City but rather was asking the City to have the City complete the stormwater 27 <br />management with all 14 properties participating in the cost. 28 <br /> 29 <br />Mayo r Mueller inquired what the cost would be for the 14 properties. 30 <br /> 31 <br />Council Member Bergeron stated at present the property was in compliance with watershed 32 <br />requirements. He indicated if the development were to be constructed the property would be out 33 <br />of compliance. City Administrative Zikmund reported this was the case, the changes were being 34 <br />driven by the development. 35 <br /> 36 <br />Mayor Mueller asked if the lots on the east would have a water feature in their backyard. 37 <br />Community Development Director Sevald explained the stormwater pond would be located in 38 <br />their backyard but this pond would only have standing water after large rain events for 48 hours. 39 <br /> 40 <br />Further discussion ensued regarding how to proceed with this matter. 41 <br /> 42 <br />Council Member Bergeron stated just because this project will pay for itself in a few years does 43 <br />not mean it is the right thing to do. 44 <br /> 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.