My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2020/06/22
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2020
>
Agenda Packets - 2020/06/22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:48:35 PM
Creation date
7/20/2020 11:51:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
6/22/2020
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
6/22/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council June 8, 2020 <br />Regular Meeting Page 5 <br /> <br />Public Works Director Peterson discussed the reason the bump was installed between the two 1 <br />driveways. 2 <br /> 3 <br />Mayor Mueller questioned if there was an additional cost that gets passed onto the property owner 4 <br />for having an extra wide driveway. Community Development Director Sevald stated the extra cost 5 <br />was not usually passed onto the property owner. 6 <br /> 7 <br />Mayor Mueller stated the last property under consideration was at 5453 Quincy Street. 8 <br /> 9 <br />Community Development Director Sevald explained with this property the driveway has a less 10 <br />than five foot setback and when the City issued a permit for the driveway it was specific for a one 11 <br />foot setback. However, when the driveway was installed the driveway had a two or three foot 12 <br />setback. He indicated the driveway was installed by the previous property owner. He commented 13 <br />the new property owner believed the fence line was the property line which was about five feet 14 <br />from the driveway. However, the fence was not on the property line. He explained staff was 15 <br />proposing to install the driveway with a five foot setback which would shift the driveway by two 16 <br />or three feet. The owners object to this for aesthetic purposes and they would like to have a straight 17 <br />driveway in order to back up their trailer. 18 <br /> 19 <br />Tanya Battista, 5307 Quincy Street, requested a variance in order to maintain the existing two curb 20 <br />cuts. She explained she would like her elderly parents to be able to have easy access to her front 21 <br />door. She noted her parents would like to maintain their independence and she would like the 22 <br />driveway to remain as is. She indicated her mom recently had knee surgery on both knees and was 23 <br />now complaining of hip pain. She reported she was predisposed to the same condition as her 24 <br />mother. She explained the second curb cut allows her mother to have easy access the front door. 25 <br />She stated if she was allowed to keep both curb cuts she would be replacing both driveways. She 26 <br />understood she had more curb and gutter than other neighbors. She indicated her lot was large 27 <br />enough that she could split the lot to have the house on one and the garage on the other, therefore 28 <br />allowing her to have two driveways. She commented her neighbors supported her driveways 29 <br />remaining as is. She did not understand why the driveways were not grandfathered in. She 30 <br />respectfully requested the City allow her to keep the two curb cuts in place. 31 <br /> 32 <br />Council Member Bergeron reminded the Council that in the past the Planning Commission and 33 <br />the Council has made accommodations for elderly parents and disabled individuals when it comes 34 <br />to access to homes. He believed this request fell into this category. 35 <br /> 36 <br />Council Member Meehlhause agreed stating the Council approved a similar request in recent years 37 <br />to allow an elderly parent better access to a home. He questioned if the property owner could 38 <br />subdivide the property and have just a garage on one lot. Community Development Director 39 <br />Sevald explained the lot with the garage would have to have sewer and water hook ups. He noted 40 <br />the property with the garage would be required to have a home built on it within one year of the 41 <br />subdivision. 42 <br /> 43 <br />Council Member Hull explained he could support this request. 44 <br /> 45 <br />Council Member Gunn agreed. 46
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.