My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2020/07/06
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2020
>
Agenda Packets - 2020/07/06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:48:49 PM
Creation date
7/20/2020 11:52:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
7/6/2020
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
7/6/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
151
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Discussion: <br />The developer is not requesting public assistance in the form of TIF, abatement, cost <br />participation or other fiscal assistance. The developer is asking for the assessments to be <br />borne by the benefiting properties. <br /> <br />The developer has requested from near inception for the City to undertake construction of the <br />street and sewer and water utilities. That request was recently amended to include storm water <br />upon a decision by Rice Creek Watershed to deny the drainage plan component of piping the <br />existing ditch. Rather, the water will need to flow into a storm water retention pond where it can <br />then be treated as it is not in the current configuration. Council has been supportive of this. <br /> <br />Council has provided fiscal assistance for the last two housing related developments; MWF and <br />Grey Stone Flats as well as indicating a willingness to do the same for the Skyline Property and <br />Tires N More/Simons Property. <br /> <br />Mounds View has very limited single family lot potential being fully developed. The City <br />experiences a small number of tear downs and rebuilds every year, likely as a function of <br />smaller homes built in the 1940’s and 1950’s sitting on heavily wooded “estate” type lots. <br /> <br />Long Lake Woods would generate 12 lots which equates to the largest single family <br />development in over a decade – Hidden Hollow being the last (2004). <br /> <br />Staff has identified as few as six and as many as 12 other similar projects; infill properties where <br />two to eight lots could be generated. All of them will have complex issues related to storm, right <br />of way partial and full acquisition, and other similar challenges. The Fields property is an <br />example – four lots and efforts have been underway since 2013. <br /> <br /> <br />Action Item/Decision: <br /> <br />1. Developer (Marty Harstad) is not requesting subsidies, but is requesting that infrastructure <br />costs be assessed to the two non-participating property owners as they benefit. <br /> <br /> <br />Staff Recommendation: <br />1. Discussion and decision/direction on appeal. <br /> <br />Future Single Family Lot Development Discussion: <br /> <br />Much of Mounds View’s housing stock is dated. Mounds View has a need for single- <br />family lots for move-up housing. Otherwise, as household incomes increase, families <br />are more likely to move out of town (Klander family), but stay within the school <br />district. In 2019, 5 single-family homes were constructed in Mounds View. In comparing <br />cities which are predominantly in the Mounds View School District, new single-family <br />homes were constructed in; Arden Hills (3), New Brighton (1), North Oaks (30), and <br />Shoreview (13). The median single-family home value (2020) is: Arden Hills $387,500; <br />Mounds View $250,750; New Brighton $299,300; North Oaks $651,800; and Shoreview <br />$336,450. $268,300 is the median value for suburban Ramsey County. New <br />construction typically starts in the low $400,000. <br /> <br />Staff have identified areas of the city for in-fill development. All of these areas have <br />challenges that have deterred developers. If the City wishes to compete with other <br />suburbs for new single-family housing, either the City needs to subsidize development <br />costs, or be content with waiting until market conditions change (e.g. it’s taken 20+ years <br />for Long Lake Woods Second Addition, to get this far). <br /> <br />Further discussion on the broader issue of infill development as this project – and- the <br />Fields property, illuminate the substantive challenges of infill. Both have revealed a <br />need to dedicate a workshop to discuss Council desire to assemble a “toolbox” specific
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.