Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Item No: __07__ <br />Meeting Date: __August 3, 2020 <br />Type of Business: ____WS___ <br />Administrator Review: ____ <br />City of Mounds View Staff Report <br />To: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />From: Nyle Zikmund, City Administrator <br />Item Title/Subject: LGU Designation <br /> <br /> <br />Introduction: <br />The Minnesota Legislature created Storm Water Management structure in the early 1970s. As <br />a result of that legislation, many metro cities joined together to form Watershed Districts. <br />Mounds View joined in creation of the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWS). <br /> <br />Watershed Districts are managed by a board of Commissioners who are appointed by elected <br />County Commissioners. Watersheds are geographically created following natural water flowage <br />and named after a distinctive water feature within the district. RCWS district encompasses an <br />area of 185 square miles that traverses parts of Anoka, Ramsey and Washington Counties as <br />well as 27 local political subdivisions. Mounds View is one of about half of those that wholly is <br />within the watershed (as compared, for example – Blaine and Spring Lake Park which is <br />covered in part by Coon Creek Watershed as well. <br /> <br /> <br />Discussion: <br />The City of Mounds View has experienced difficulties and challenges working with the <br />Watershed on permitting issues and storm water management. This has been going on for <br />more than a decade. <br /> <br />In the past several years the City has; <br />1. Reached out to RCWS to discuss storm water management specific to infiltration basins <br />(Rain Gardens) and was unable to resolve the issue. <br />2. Following statutory guidelines, provided a slate of nominees for RCWS Commissioner <br />appointment by the Ramsey County Board of Commissioners resulting in a new board <br />appointment. <br />3. Formed with other concerned communities, an ad-hoc committee to explore legislation <br />and legal recourse. <br />4. Followed efforts by several (5) Anoka County cities who followed similar statutory <br />guidelines advocate for a change in Commission Board members which is currently now <br />under legal challenge by the Cities as the Anoka County Board rejected the slate of <br />nominees. <br />5. Worked with every single developer in the City over the last 3-5 years on the permitting <br />process as 100% get rejected the first time by RCWS on their storm water management. <br />6. Discovered a Significant failure in their inspection process on a development (Long View <br />Estates) that will cost in excess of $10,000 to remedy. They are reviewing and will get <br />back to us. <br />7. Met with them numerous times – face to face and virtual to share our concerns and <br />frustration regarding infiltration ponds, inspection, permitting and now concerns <br />regarding the Quincy street project. <br />8. Duplicate regulations from RCWD, the City already is required to meet these regulations <br />under the MS4 permit under the MPCA. <br /> <br /> <br />