Laserfiche WebLink
past 5 years, there are 5 to 7 applications per year. <br />2. Expanding our engineering contract to undertake the technical review will allow one less <br />– very expense, review of plans. Furthermore, our contract engineer knows our storm <br />water system which will allow the developer design team to work directly with the city <br />resulting in fewer rejections and subsequent modifications. <br />3. Both Circle Pines and Hugo report taking on the LGU was one of the best decisions they <br />have ever made. Their developers and residents are more comfortable working with the <br />City and both administrators have shared that they now promote, in the Economic <br />Development efforts, that they are the LGU and one stop shopping with numerous <br />developers applauding and reaching out to them (more in Hugo). <br />4. RCWS has a culture or regulation versus customer service and partnership with <br />municipalities . We have little influence on changing that but control our culture which is <br />strong on Customer Service. By becoming the LGU, we are better positioned to <br />continue our model of extraordinary customer service. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br />Receive presentation, discuss and determine next step. <br /> <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Nyle Zikmund <br />City Administrator <br /> <br />Attachments: <br />Draft MOA <br />Draft Permit <br />Draft Permit Fee (Current RCWS Fee Schedule <br />Draft Storm Water Management Plan <br />