Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council UNAPPROVED <br />SiJuly 1988 <br />Regular Meeting Page Six <br />-------------------------------------------------------------�--------- <br />Mr. Merila stated Mr. Harstad did not what to set a <br />precedent of purchasing property when he felt it was <br />the City's responsibility, so he declined the oppor- <br />tunity to purchase it himself. <br />Mayor Linke asked if Mr. Harstad had pursued it any <br />further after the City informed trim they would not <br />provide the property to him. Mr. Merila responded he <br />was not sure. <br />Mr. Thorton stated the focus of the hardship is on <br />the City's current wetland requirements, which would <br />essentially preclude development of all but one of <br />the lots. He added a taking has occurred with the <br />refusal to allow building within the 100' buffer, and <br />thus, a variance must be granted. Ile stated that <br />Barr Engineering concedes their proposal would enhance <br />the phosphorus stripping capacity. He added it was <br />also a hardship in requiring 100% stripping, as it is <br />impossible, and more is known now than in 1982 when the <br />ordinance was written, and if private property is to <br />be used for public purposes, the owner must be compen- <br />sated. <br />Mr. Thorton also ex1pressed displeasure with the City's <br />recording secretary, as it was his opinion she was not <br />including all the pertinent information he wanted in <br />the minutes, or the essential points made by Mr. Merila. <br />City Planner Herman reviewed her memo to the Council <br />of July 20, summarizing the various issues to be <br />addressed. She axplained it was the Planning Commissions <br />opinion that, taking into consideration Chapters 48, 49 <br />and 49A, with the illustrations presented by the developer, <br />that the requirements could not be met without variances <br />being granted. She added that due to time constraints in <br />which the Council must take action, they have not had <br />enough time to rasearcn all the methodology possible for <br />the phosphorus stripping, and the Planning Commission had <br />felt there was incomplete information given to them at <br />the time of dpplication concerning Chapter 40.06 and how <br />the developer would address that. <br />I* was noted the representatives from Barr Engineering <br />were present, and they had no comment to make. <br />Ken Briggs, of Harstad Comnanl, introduced himself. <br />Mr. Merila explained that it was his understanding at the <br />time of submittal that the information being provided to <br />the Planning Commission was adequate, and when he became <br />aware that additional was necessary, it was submitted to <br />the City, and since Staff was not available at that time, <br />due to being on vacation, it was not given to the Planning <br />Commission until their meeting. He added that he had a <br />copy of the ordinance and had felt the information he <br />originally submitted was adequate. <br />