My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2021-05-05 PC
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
2021-05-05 PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/4/2024 7:44:56 AM
Creation date
7/7/2021 12:22:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Planning Commission
DOC TYPE
PACKETS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Item No: 06A <br />Meeting Date: May 5, 2021 <br />Type of Business: Other <br />Planning Case: <br />City of Mounds View Staff Report <br />To: Planning Commission <br />From: Jon Sevald, Community Development Director <br />Item Title/Subject: Discussion - Signs <br />Discussion: <br />Previously, the Planning Commission asked to discuss sign regulations. At the March 3rd <br />Commission meeting, the scope was narrowed more toward the brightness of dynamic (digital) <br />signs. <br />Attached is a comparison of sign codes specific to city corridors similar to Mounds View <br />Boulevard, for Ground, Wall, and Dynamic signs. Since the March meeting, information has <br />been added regarding the maximum brightness of Dynamic Signs. Although Mounds View has <br />maximum brightness standards, we do not have a tool to enforce this (costs about $2,000). <br />Rather, the City requires that dynamic displays be installed with a manual override, in the event <br />the sign's automated dimmer fails. <br />Community Development Staff are not aware of any complaints about signage (excluding <br />temporary signs), other than complaints generated by other City Staff. <br />The Commission is encouraged to drive the Boulevard a few times, and provide an opinion as to <br />what Commission members would change, if anything. For example, if there is a most favored, <br />or least favored sign characteristics. One thing to note is that older signs which are non- <br />conforming, can be repaired or replaced, but cannot be expanded. This means that some of the <br />lesser desirable signs will likely stay until the property is re -developed. Also, a number of <br />variances have been approved for signs over the years (e.g. McDonalds, BP, & Days Inn, <br />Interactive Playground). <br />Recommendation: <br />Staff requests that Commissioners drive Mounds View Boulevard, and be prepared to discuss <br />likes & dislikes. If Staff were to change anything, it would be to add diagrams to the Ordinance <br />to visually explain requirements. <br />Respectfully, <br />14P-NaSiF <br />Jon Sevald, AICP <br />Community Development Director <br />ATTACHED: <br />Photos <br />Sign comparison <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.