My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-03-2021
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
03-03-2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/7/2021 12:29:52 PM
Creation date
7/7/2021 12:29:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Minutes
GOVBOARD
Planning Commission
DOCTYPE
minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission March 3, 2021 <br />Regular Meeting Page 3 <br />________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> <br />A roll call vote was taken. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 6 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br /> <br /> <br />6. Other Planning Activity <br /> <br />A. Discussion – Signs <br /> <br />Community Development Director Sevald stated at a previous Planning Commission meeting, <br />the Commission asked to discuss sign regulations. Sign regulations are complicated. Mounds <br />View’s sign regulations are outdated, in terms of regulating dynamic (digital) signs, and perhaps <br />other types of signs (e.g. drive-thru menu boards, and temporary signs). Staff reviewed a <br />comparison of cities’ wall and ground sign regulations, specific to zoning districts along streets <br />that are similar to Mounds View Boulevard. He requested feedback from the Commission on the <br />likes and dislikes regarding the signs in Mounds View. <br /> <br />Commissioner Nelson stated he wanted to see the City properly prepared for electronic/digital <br />signs. He noted he also wanted the City to have better language in place to address temporary <br />signs. Community Development Director Sevald reported dynamic display signs became a big <br />topic in 2008 when digital billboards became popular. He commented further on the history of <br />digital signs and colored digital signs in Mounds View. He indicated the City has not kept up to <br />date with the changing technology when it comes to signs. <br /> <br />Commissioner Farmer commented he would like to see how other communities are dealing with <br />safety concerns with digital signs along highways. <br /> <br />Commissioner French indicated he did not love the idea of blinking, flashing signs in residential <br />areas. He explained he has always been unsure about that. <br /> <br />Further discussion ensued regarding the use of temporary signs in the City. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Sevald explained he would report back to the Commission <br />with a comparison on what is allowed in Mounds View versus other cities <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />B. Discussion – Home Occupations <br /> <br />Community Development Director Sevald stated Home Occupations are an accessory use of a <br />home for a non-residential purpose (e.g. working from home). The general intent (how Staff has <br />interpreted this) is that a person standing outside a home, should not be able to tell that a <br />business is operating out of the home. Home Businesses cannot have employees, exterior <br />storage, on-street parking; or anything that is not typically found on a residential property.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.