My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2021/09/27
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
Agenda Packets - 2021/09/27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:14 PM
Creation date
10/14/2021 7:10:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
9/27/2021
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
Packets
Date
9/27/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council September 13, 2021 <br />Regular Meeting Page 7 <br />1 drain into the storm sewer. <br />3 Council Member Meehlhause questioned what percentage of Ramsey County property taxes does <br />4 the City of Mounds View represent. Finance Director Beer estimated the County's percentage of <br />5 the tax bill was 26%. <br />7 Council Member Meehlhause inquired if additional equipment or staff would be required to <br />8 maintain the proposed trail. Public Works/Parks and Recreation Director Peterson stated the City <br />9 already had equipment to plow the sidewalk; it would simply take staff a little more time. He <br />10 estimated the future maintenance costs would be fog sealing in the future. <br />11 <br />12 Council Member Meehlhause asked how many streets in Mounds View do not have curb and <br />13 gutter. Public Works/Parks and Recreation Director Peterson commented Pleasantview has an <br />14 asphalt curb and gutter and Spring Lake Road did not have either curb or gutter. <br />15 <br />16 Council Member Meehlhause commented further on how the concrete driveway with rebar would <br />17 be impacted by this project because curb and gutter would now be installed. <br />18 <br />19 Council Member Bergeron inquired what action the Council was being asked to take this evening. <br />20 Public Works/Parks and Recreation Director Peterson stated the Council was being asked to keep <br />21 the project moving forward. He noted plans cannot be changed or altered once the 100% designs <br />22 are created because this was an MSA roadway. <br />23 <br />24 Mayor Mueller questioned if the homes along Spring Lake Road on the north side of Mounds View <br />25 Boulevard had their mailboxes placed two to a post when the last street project was completed. <br />26 Public Works/Parks and Recreation Director Peterson reported this was the case. <br />27 <br />28 Mayor Mueller discussed her street reconstruction experience noting she did not have any concerns <br />29 with the grouped mailboxes. She noted she had a bike trail and sidewalk along Groveland Road, <br />30 which she lived on. She explained these amenities had really grown on her noting the City removes <br />31 the snow along the sidewalk and the trail and sidewalk have improved pedestrian safety. She <br />32 described how the City worked with her to allow her to save her gardens and plantings. She <br />33 commented on how her driveway was impacted through the street project. She stated in the end <br />34 the street improvement project turned out to be a real blessing for her family. <br />35 <br />36 Public Works/Parks and Recreation Director Peterson reported the 100% plans will be coming <br />37 back to the City Council for consideration on October 25, 2021 prior to being submitted to State <br />38 Aid. <br />39 <br />40 Mayor Mueller questioned if the City would be able to submit two plans to State Aid for <br />41 consideration for this project. Tyler McLeete, Stantec, explained the challenge around the decision <br />42 if a trail or sidewalk should go forward was that he needed to understand if the trail would be <br />43 installed at some point in the future as part of the design or if the road would be kept in the same <br />44 place. He discussed how this impacted the road model within the right-of-way. He commented if <br />45 the sidewalk was installed back to curb, this would require him to go back to the watershed district <br />46 with new BMP's. He indicated this was possible, but would just impact the roadway location and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.