Laserfiche WebLink
Prnrprh irp <br />1. Correspondence was acknowledged by the Director of Public Works. (Attach document) <br />2. Date initial on -site inspection was conducted. <br />3. Surveys, traffic counts, accident analysis, pedestrian volumes, etc. were performed. <br />(Y or N) (Attach document) <br />4. One or more of the criteria applies to request? (Y or N) <br />Per policy list criteria(s) from policy <br />5. Public Safety Department contacted regarding speeding/accident issues? (Y or N) <br />(Attach document) <br />6. Neighborhood was contacted to determine support or denial for the traffic control change. <br />(Y or N) (Attach document) <br />7. Criteria meets Policy; neighborhood is supportive of decision. <br />Resolution Number recommending traffic control change. _ <br />Comments <br />************************************************************************************************************** <br />Criteria was not met <br />Director of Public Works sent correspondence to proper person(s) that requested traffic control <br />change with the option to address the City Council. (Attach document) <br />Should a petition be presented to the City Council, a traffic study will be recommended and then <br />facilitated by the City Engineer before the installation of any traffic control is authorized. <br />Comments <br />Director of Public Works <br />Date <br />All documentation has been scanned to the Address File of <br />